Alan Miller shook and trembled on gurney after becoming second person to be executed by controversial technique

Alabama has carried out the second execution in the US using the controversial method of nitrogen gas, an experimental technique for humans that veterinarians have deemed unacceptable in the US and Europe for the euthanasia of most animals.

Alan Eugene Miller, 59, was pronounced dead on Thursday evening at a south Alabama prison. The lethal method involves being strapped to a gurney, where a respirator mask is applied to the face and pure nitrogen piped in. The resulting oxygen deprivation will cause death by asphyxia.

Miller shook and trembled on the gurney for about two minutes with his body at times pulling against the restraints, followed by about six minutes of gasping breathing, according to the Associated Press.

Miller’s death is the latest in an extraordinary week in the US in which five condemned men in five states are set to be killed over six days. Three prisoners have already been executed – on Friday South Carolina killed Khalil Divine Black Sun Allah in its first execution in 13 years, then on Tuesday Texas killed Travis Mullis and Missouri put to death Marcellus Williams.

  • Nate Cox@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Multiple reports from observers of this execution method: it’s horrible, they thrash around on the gurney and seem to suffer greatly

    This guy: nuh uh.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They’re not doing it correctly. The person needs to be cooperative and able to follow instructions, and they need to be using a specific type of mask that vents their breath with the carbon dioxide out.

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        Yeah, I’m pretty sure most people aren’t going to cooperate in their own execution.

        This isn’t like assisted suicide/euthanasia. These are, by definition, people being forced into this by the state. At least some portion of them are always going to be uncooperative.

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah. The suicide pods are a good example. There’s enough space in them that the person won’t experience CO2 buildup in the short amount of time it takes.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yes, and they need to violate every human instinct and cooperate. They know this gas is there with the specific purpose to kill them against their will, it’s incredibly difficult to voluntarily breathe in that situation

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No, they don’t need to cooperate. If you struggle and thrash, no matter how you die, you’ll endure the struggle and thrashing.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I apologize if I implied they should cooperate. Cooperation is necessary for the painlessness. But I believe they have the right to fight to their dying moment and that it is laudable to do so

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, good luck getting someone to be cooperative and calmly following instructions while being murdered by the government in front of an audience 🙄

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            True. Pretty fucked up how the proponents of state murder can’t see how those are fundamentally different situations.

            • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              14 hours ago

              That’s also why I’m being so active in this comments section; I don’t want people reading about compassionate euthenasia thinking “wait isn’t that how they torture people to death?” because it’s not unless you’re basically trying to use it that way. I’ve actually been briefly trained on what to do in an inert gas leak in some of the radiology safety modules for work because some of the imaging machinery uses inert gas and they literally tell you it’s super easy to accidentally die that way because by the time you’ve even noticed you’re almost dead.

              • Nate Cox@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                You’re getting pushback here because you’re conflating two entirely different scenarios—capital punishment and assisted suicide—without clarifying that you understand the difference. I can understand what your intent might be but you’re using the same arguments that proponents of capital punishment are using to claim this is a good way to execute people.

                It comes off as “no, these people aren’t suffering” instead of “it really sucks that these people are suffering, the arguments for it being humane don’t apply to this scenario and we should stop doing it” (which is what I want to believe you mean).