If between two variants in a decision there’s a huge difference in incomes for someone, that someone will find a way to make the deciding party interested in that difference.

Which is why good guys should introduce good things slowly and carefully, the way bad guys introduce bad things (unless they are too powerful to care).

This may happen, but not the same way, all I can say.

Wait, 1138? If there are any Star Wars fans in there, there won’t be more.

Tatooine monks when?

because of their deep and abiding fear of the Evil Russian Backed KDP party (god damn, everything old really is new again)

You missed the moment where NSDAP and German communists kinda had intersecting constituencies, as in “angry young people with nothing good to do”.

Many stormtroopers were members of both at different points of their, eh, path.

And then, what really kicked off martial law was the Reichstagg fire,

Which was almost certainly a false flag operation by Nazis.

Liberals, Conservatives, and Fascists all united under a single banner in their staunch hatred of German Communism.

Such parallels always suck. They didn’t really have liberals in the Weimar republic. It was all conservatives, monarchists, nationalists, and some fishy social-democrats. And it was kinda authoritarian at every point.

This was decades after German military police and Freikorps paramilitary groups under Hindenburg crushed the Spartacus League during the 1919 strike wave. The leaders of the movement - Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht, and Franz Mehring - were executed by the police and the organizations disbanded under threat of further imprisonment/execution.

Yep. You might consider that such a republic shouldn’t be so readily compared to the US.

I’m not saying future is cool.

These fit under “state-level scams”.

EDIT: Still, while I wasn’t going to compliment them or something, it can be a valid strategy for survival to use anything to accumulate some operational power ; I can see a few nations (not all of them have recognized states) on the map for which it may be necessary to survive in the following decade. But Nazis didn’t have to take such risks, it was ideological for them that theft and robbery are better than honest work.

They’ve also ran a few state-level scams and Ponzi schemes to have the funds for that military and other spending.

Their business model was - step 1, cheat to have money, step 2, use money to rearm, step 3, conquer and loot, thus get funds that way, step 4 probably would be to force some peace, then rearm, then rinse and repeat, but they didn’t manage to capture a few strategic areas they needed in time. So they had fuel shortages, food shortages, and ultimately lost.

Wtf I wrote in the end…

What do you expect, people think Hitler was good for most Germans and restored economy and made trains run on time, and the defeat part oh well. Because that’s what movies show. And that’s because for commies Hitler was just a variation of the west, probably less capricious, while for the west Hitler was bad, but good against commies. So both would show Nazis as being better than their opponent.

In a Linux distribution for a particular architecture all code is compiled to the underlying CPU architecture. Packages can also be built from source.

Not all code is written portable. Say, many things won’t compile or won’t work under PPC64.

MIPS64 is not a very common architecture today. We know XOrg, FVWM and Emacs will probably work, so I expect this thing to be usable for many things. But not just as good as Linux on amd64.

History with project TRON shows that it’s more likely that importing those will just become illegal.

I meant alternative browsers, like vimb or surf, but on Gecko and not WebKit.

Yes, and social media deliver on that wish by punishing nuanced opinions and anything which is not the lowest common denominator.

And they did that from the very beginning.

In the olden days what was acceptable on a web forum was defined by its owner and some mods. Everything had an alternative, people would communicate over few systems simultaneously - the forums themselves, ICQ, mail. When you were banned on some forum, you didn’t lose anyone of the people there.

It was certain that you can’t silence someone just by banning them. And conflicts were regular, so somebody and their friends would be banned or leave some place, but they were still part of a larger social fabric on some subject.

Social media style hate storms and insularity actually were discouraged. They bothered the mods, other people and in general were stopped by banning all participants for a month or so in the specific place the argument happened.

And what’s the normal behavior for social media today was unambiguously considered trolling back then. All of it.

When normies came to social media, they realized that now yes, you can silence anyone you don’t like, just have more friends or gaslight more strangers and that’s it. And you can troll as much as you want if it attracts more attention. In a social network there’s only one authority.

It was false in the beginning, people were not effectively silenced, and disinformation wasn’t that strong, but with more people moving to social media it became true.

Also Gecko’s development is led by people thinking that it being usable outside of Firefox\Thunderbird is a bad thing. There was a time when Gnome’s browser was based on Gecko, not WebKit. And in general it’s influenced by bad practices.

SerenityOS is an amazing project, of course. To do so much work for something completely disconnected from the wider FOSS ecosystem, and with such results.

So it’s cool that they’ve decided to split off the browser as its own project.

Anything touching your texts is a wildly dystopian idea.

It’s like boiling a frog, now EU is already trying to do things which would be considered unbelievable dystopian shit in Russia, year 2008.

They got here by accepting smaller steps in the direction of unbelievable dystopian shit, because “what, are you a sovereign citizen”, “dura lex sed lex”, “we are not a libertarian institution and we need to catch criminals”, “we need to regulate society for a better future”, “our institutions and bureaucracy are built to prevent such erosion, we won’t go down that slippery slope”, yadda-yadda.

One thing people should realize is that common sense and dignity are above any law, no matter how correctly passed. Concentration camps in Nazi Germany and wherever else were perfectly legal. Those people will build in the future will be perfectly legal too. Hell, those they are building right now are legal and your government (any on the planet) doesn’t argue with that.

And not only that, but you don’t even have to argue against laws invading your freedom, they are simply negligible. You don’t have to prove that you don’t need something, “I don’t want this” is sufficient!

Also read this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_of_a_Dog .

I’m afraid this can be similar to saturation of air defenses.

They haven’t passed this particular package (quite scary, yes), but what have they passed lately?

What has happened?

What would we see if we look not for threats to fight against, but for something that we have already missed?

That’s in some sense getting back to the “open protocols” idea of ~2005, with federation and common identities. You’d still have 1) bothersome process of maintaining such a site, 2) problems how to find such, 3) an identity provider which can go down with your identity, like a Lemmy instance can.

It’s insufficient. Facebook and others have used an existing demand for a recommendation system and automatic moderation and search and all this junk.

I’m enthusiastic about Locutus.

I would argue that this culture would possibly be good to learn from them, first. It didn’t come to existence as some kind of social evolution, but was impressed by power.

Second, at least they are behind Europeans in the culture of genocide.

In ex-USSR it was pretty intentional.

It is still a thing, but nobody wants to use it, because the flaws of other systems they want to use for themselves.