Us elders be here designing the shit that does crypto.
Us elders be here designing the shit that does crypto.
Gesundheit!
I hadn’t realised the USB committee had found new jobs.
Not saying you’re wrong (because I’ve always found it suspicious how Tesla always seems to report that autopilot is disengaged for fatal accidents) but there’s probably some people asking themselves “how could it detect the wall to disengage itself?”.
The image on the wall has a perspective baked into it so it will look right from a certain position. A distance from which the lines of the real road match perfectly with the lines of the road on the wall. As you get closer than this distance the illusion will start to break down. The object tracking software will say “There are things moving in ways I can’t predict. Something is wrong here. I give up. Hand control to driver”.
Autopilot disengaged.
(And it only noticed a fraction of a second before hitting it, yet Mark is very conscious of it. He’s screaming. )
Sidenote: the same is true as you move further from the wall than the ideal distance. The illusion will break down in that way too. However, the effect is far more subtle when you’re too far away. After all, the wall is just a tiny bit of your view when you’re a long way away, but it’s your whole view when you’re just about to hit it.
He said he tapped the brakes on one of the earlier non-wall runs.
Whilst I agree on the wall, fog and rain are not extreme weather conditions. I’d rather he’d used a level of rain that was less intense. However, the fact is lidar still worked even though it was not clear it was going to.
For those that didn’t see it…
Set it and forget it, eh?
Any distro you like, as long as you stop futzing with it.
Seriously… they’re breaking because you change things. Linux machines stay up for years without issue. Stop breaking the install.
There was a Nazi rally at Madison Square Gardens. The US is very nationalistic (How many countries force their children to pledge alliance to the flag daily?) and that can easily become a problem.
One thing a lot of people really struggle with is that if you see something going on you don’t like in an organisation, you have to options:
I think too many people choose option 1, especially in politics. They resign and say “not in my name”. However, from their opponents point of view they’re now defeated. The obstacle is removed. They can now do exactly what they wanted to do, and probably go further.
The harder option is 2. Stay and fight, and probably lose multiple times, but you’ll make your opponent’s goals as hard as possible to achieve. You may even start winning and through your example bring others to your cause.
So 30-50¢ each.
Doesn’t sound that bad.
Each?
You might want to state the normal purchasing quantity for people outside the US.
It’s called a revolt.
deleted by creator
The fastest way to have a people turn on it’s leaders is for the food supply to be threatened.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if Americans turned on their leaders?
Then it’ll be really effective at immobilising them.
The UK did pay the US back for WW2 support. Took 60 years to pay off.
You force the shutdown, otherwise Congress has abdicated it’s role.
Somebody got to Schumer IMHO.
No. She’s on a path that will shape the democrats of the future. If she leaves she will become irrelevant, and she knows it.
Scammers never let a good global crisis get in their way.