• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Shrimp have multiple color recptors because their brains are too primitive/rudimentary to combine input from more than a single receptor into a composite color. The result is that 12 colors (or however many receptors it is) is the total number of colors they can see.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        and can see polarized light

        So can we. It’s also like to point out that seeing polarized light is different from being able to tell that it is polarized. Which we can still do, just not as well

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Well yeah, that thought is important. While apples do have an objective color in the sense that physics teaches us that electromagnetic radiation with a certain frequency is more or less likely to be absorbed/reflected, we can only perceive a subjective color.

    I personally define reality as any measurement that a machine (computer or robot) can take. As such, there is an objective reality. But also, most people mostly act on emotion and not based on real data.

    But also, this isn’t a meme. It belongs in the philosophy or science memes community.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I personally define reality as any measurement that a machine (computer or robot) can take. As such, there is an objective reality.

      Is there? How do you determine whether the machine doing the measurements is real?

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The face punch method, (not a personal attack just a rather crude if effective philisophical tool) aka if I repeatedly punch you in the face you have a hard time continuing to argue that my fist is not real, or at the very least real enough for practical purposes. Personal involvment makes the situation a lot less abstract.

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Oh, I never argued that fist are not a good way to determine reality, but calling your fist a machine is cringe.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I sincerely doubt you ran into anything given that you don’t exist.