- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Translation: “Illegal” -> “Waah, me no like!”
Once donvict can finish the creation of The Ministry of Love, he’ll be able to sic the Thought Police on these illegal news outlets.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Truth will be very busy putting out the real news. Faux, Breitbart, Newsmax, OAN, and a whole lot of podcasters and youtubers are going to be subsidiaries in this new glorious world of free speech maximalism.
For how many years have Republicans gone on about the constitution and the first amendment, and cried censorship at the slightest criticism of their utterances? And now Trump is explicitly having people arrested and deported for vocing opinions, and Republicans range from silent to enthusiastic. They never believed in the constitution or in free speech. They just didn’t like it when people disagreed with them.
They never believed in the constitution or in free speech. They just didn’t like it when people disagreed with them.
The evidence has always been in their actions. Hate speech hampers freedom of speech, and they wanted to protect hate speech. This puts them in direct conflict with a genuinely free society.
Preserving the greatest amount of freedom for the greatest amount of people usually means giving up some smaller specific freedoms, like, you know, the freedom to threaten the lives of minorities.
Personally, I think they should be allowed to threaten - and for those minorities and good folk to openly promise bloody murder if the racists tried their luck.
The right-wing traditionally has a monopoly on violence, not just physical, but also in speech. When you are free of consequence, your reach will grasp ever further. Like what Trump is doing with his EOs.
I love the energy, but the reality is that minorities do not have the power of the oppressors. Allowing that kind of back and fourth will be met with larger consequences for one group than the other. But again, conceptually, I’m with you.
IMO, the thing of most value for my position is that it normalizes opposition and resistance. After MLK died, the media was used to enshrine his approach in the history books…and Malcom X was a footnote at best for most students. It is through offering the promise of violent revolution if peaceful evolution wasn’t negotiated, is how we got here without too many corpses.
By removing the notion of violence from protest, things were lost:
1: Fewer people to protest anything. The elimination of ‘rough’ characters simply meant fewer people to raise signs, fists, or to speak.
2: It has become taboo to associate with people who believe in giving as good as they get, or being aggressive. This means that kind protestors simply don’t communicate with the violent ones, so there is less coordination for their goals.
3: A wider array of actions to do for protest. For example, ignoring ‘safe space’ rules, such as the perimeter around JD Vance’s house, or burning Teslas in America, or displaying the (wax) severed heads of Trump and friends. These aren’t kind things, but they certainly give a message to the people in charge.
If roughness in politics among everyday people was ordinary, we might have more work strikes - or the people in the US Treasury could have denied DOGE unlawful entry, because the spirit of opposition was ingrained into people in that other timeline.
Yep, this is the big issue. Majorities rule by force. If the minorities were able to change things by fighting back, they would have already done so. But as it currently stands, one side has a much larger capacity for violence, and it is not the minority.
At this point, the attempts to explain to the uneducated are futile, there is no going back.
Americans, sadly even the good ones, will now reap what the R’s have sown.
There is nothing left to defend if nobody is willing to defend it.
Maybe this time explaining this in reaction to them behaving this way for the millionth time in the last 50 years will get em.
No? Maybe we should take action instead. This is no surprise. We know what they are.
So… back to Tritler Bingo….
Did anyone have:
Trump not only takes a page from Hitler’s playbook, but openly recites it for all to hear?
He spent a lot of time preparing for that.
Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler’s collected speeches, My New Order, which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed. Kennedy now guards a copy of My New Order in a closet at his office, as if it were a grenade. Hitler’s speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.
“Did your cousin John give you the Hitler speeches?” I asked Trump.
Trump hesitated. “Who told you that?”
“I don’t remember,” I said.
“Actually, it was my friend Marty Davis from Paramount who gave me a copy of Mein Kampf, and he’s a Jew.” (“I did give him a book about Hitler,” Marty Davis said. “But it was My New Order, Hitler’s speeches, not Mein Kampf. I thought he would find it interesting. I am his friend, but I’m not Jewish.”)
Hitler’s speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.
That’s not quite true. Hitler wasn’t an effective speaker when he started, knew it, and got a lot of coaching. From the beginning, when he was an Army snitch spying on the fascists, he was being groomed.
Honestly, the two are complete opposites when it comes to style of speech: Hitler imparts certainty in the listener, and Trump causes utter confusion. The only similarity is that both are completely evil.
imparts certainty in the listener
Trump does too if you’re a moron.
His speeches sound like a grandpa getting more and more senile. I’m convinced a lot of his supporters have never listened to one in its entirety.
Yeah man. It’s the free space in the center. You got to read the full board.
The Free Speech crowd will be here any minute now! /s
One day he’ll be convicted in the court of public opinion but by then Not Sure will be the smartest person in history and President Camacho will pardon him.
I’d say he’s gonna be the bad guy in the documentary, but he’s gonna be the bad guy in the cautionary warning we leave to any spacefaring species that finds our ruins on the dead earth.
Soon, he will begin borrowing from Putin’s book by making criticising the government illegal, and forcing news organizations to register as foreign agents.
I guess if you make all of the articles about journalists being traumatized then you get no stories about the other victims…
I would love to hear him cite the exact laws he thinks they have broken and in what way.
“I’m the President, and I say it’s illegal, so it’s illegal! Isn’t that how it works?”
Unfortunately at this moment in time it seems to be that way.
After trump is finally ousted and declared anathema, we should make it illegal to be orange.
I’m willing to make exceptions for the jaundiced.
A sure sign of a stable, competent, and entirely not corrupt leader if I’ve ever seen one!
So tired of this childish twat and his supporters.
i have run out of things to say about what’s going on with him. all the shitty awful things he says/does/will do.
all i have left now is “this fucking guy”
I’ve been going with a hearty sigh, followed by “…god dammit.” for awhile now.
If you start looking, you will always find something in such a large organization. Whether that’s worth it, well…
