• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        What did they pirate specifically and why nobody is suing them for it? Please go ahead.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          What I said in my last comment was

          Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.

          I’m not sure why this didn’t satisfy your pedantry before, but maybe you didn’t read it when you replied to it last time.

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Ok, I see now.

              I was saying that they benefitted from other people pirating their games.

              You thought I meant that they benefitted from pirating their own games.

              I can see how what I wrote could be interpreted that way. But no, I meant that they benefitted from their games having been pirated in the past by pirates.

              • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                40 minutes ago

                I think you misunderstand the root of the argument. You’re referencing Nintendo copying someone’s rip and that seems illogical - DRM circumvention is illegal under DMCA and similar laws, right? Nintendo is the owner of the license and not licensee for those things however so they can’t really circumvent anything and therefore there is no law against that. Nintendo can download Mario roms off the internet legally because they are the publisher and won’t sue themselves obviously.