• go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    You’re conflating MitM, which is specifically defined as an attack, with the concept of a middleman. NYou acknowledge that it’s not an attack, even:

    It just means it’s not a man-in-the-middle attack.

    The other things you’re describing are also framed specifically in a way that makes Cloudflare seem like some sort of bad actor out of the norm.

    • You say users have no choice in using Cloudflare Yeah, the party that runs the service/website/whatever decides what services they use to serve their content. Nothing special there. If you are against Amazon then users have no choice but to use them when the other side chooses to use their services, or any other service provider which includes the ones you like. Similarly, users would have to resolve DNS records to determine what services they are connecting to.

    You also don’t have to use Cloudflare’s proxy. You can just use them for DNS record management. You can use different SSL settings that allow an unencrypted connection between Cloudflare and the server, or you can enforce strict SSL policies where it is encrypted end-to-end.

    You’re going to have to prove any of your claims, or else I am just going to assume you’re talking out of your ass. Particularly because you’re clearly misunderstanding what a MitM is, or you’re intentionally misusing it.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’re conflating MitM,

      Heh… It’s safe to assume I’m well versed in this topic.

      You’re going to have to prove any of your claims, or else I am just going to assume you’re talking out of your ass.

      I am not, however, inclined to indulge rudeness. Bye bye.

      • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Oookay. I wasn’t actually claiming you were talking out of your ass. I was explaining that without backing up your claims with information, then that would be the conclusion.

        Since you are refusing to do so, and since you seemed to identify with that, along with clearly conflating the two terms to suit your narrative. I can now say it’s safe to assume that you are talking out of your ass. Especially considering the first part of your response reeks of arrogance.