cm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 4 days agoWaiting for new old outlooklemmy.mlimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1790arrow-down111
arrow-up1779arrow-down1imageWaiting for new old outlooklemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 days agoHonestly, bring back waterfall development cycles… They we awful and failed a lot, by at least we didn’t have zombie failures being used!
minus-squaredovah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 days agoDeploying incrementally doesn’t need to mean releasing incrementally.
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoThat’s a great point , but even the degenerates in the windows and office teams make an absolute mess of things and tend to prioritize BS cosmetic changes over actual improvements as a result
Honestly, bring back waterfall development cycles…
They we awful and failed a lot, by at least we didn’t have zombie failures being used!
Deploying incrementally doesn’t need to mean releasing incrementally.
That’s a great point , but even the degenerates in the windows and office teams make an absolute mess of things and tend to prioritize BS cosmetic changes over actual improvements as a result