The theorem has been expressed colloquially as “you can’t comb a hairy ball flat without creating a cowlick” or “you can’t comb the hair on a coconut”.

  • sga@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    usually it is just a redirection. One of the reasons wiki does this is that their stack is more older device friendly (for the most part, you can use wikipedia perfectly fine without any js), and having adaptive view usually requires js (there are some other ways too), but wiki is constrained. So when browser recieves a request from a mobile user agent, they just redirect to mobile site.

      • sga@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That may be the case, but i have seen websites use js for it. Another thing is, what version of css does wikipedia target, as ye older verisons might not have that.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sure, some websites do that, but it’s simply wrong to say “having adaptive view usually requires js”. No, it doesn’t, usually responsive design doesn’t need JS.

          If a browser doesn’t support media queries, it would just show the desktop version. Media queries have been broadly supported since 2015. It’s possible that Wikipedia still targets older browsers, but IMO it would be fine to show the desktop version on mobile browsers older than that.

          • sga@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Even in my original comment i said there are non js ways. But what i primarly meant here is, there are differnt “ideas” of implementing a mobile site, some just change element sizes, and make them vertical viewing friendly, but others do change quite a lot, for example, remove most clickable items from the header-bar or title bar, and move them to a kebab/hamburger menu. And I know even this particular example can be done in pure css, but I still feel my statement is not simply wrong.

            Also I am not a front end dev, so I am sorry if I get stuff wrong.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              No, you’re right. The important part I wanted to highlight is that the usual way is CSS, not JS. There are a bunch of websites that use JS for this purpose, and probably also many CMSs etc., but doing it using CSS is far more common.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Its not just old devices. I turn js off for security. There’s a whole class of high-risk users that this is for. Even on modern hardware and software.

      • sga@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        me too, i was simplifying it. I have a global js disable rule, and whitelist a shorter list