• SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    the company said it would start turning off Manifest V2 extensions

    …in time for Black Friday & the holiday sales?

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have always used Firefox on all my devices, except for one: the Chromebook I was forced to buy because of compatibility with my college’s test proctoring spyware.

    On that device, not only did uBlock Origin quit working the other day, but today Chrome even kept disabling uBlock Lite with the error message that “This extension reloaded itself too frequently”. It could be some kind of legitimate bug, but it sure feels a lot like foul play on Google’s part.

  • aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Stopped using that garbage browser a couple of weeks ago. Hardened Firefox ftw. Just using stock Firefox isn’t enough if you’re concerned about your privacy on the internet btw. If all you’re looking for is an ad free experience tho, then stock Firefox should be enough.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Firefox’s future isn’t looking good with all that layoffs and lost money. I am very scared that it might go the way of Opera, and then we will trully have nothing left.

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          All of those are still standing on Firefox’s shoulders and the actual rendering engine on the browser isn’t really trivial thing to build. Sure, they’re not going away, and likely Firefox will be around too for quite a while, but the world wide web as we currently know it is changing and Google and Microsoft are few of the bigger players pushing the change.

          If you’re old enough you’ll remember the banners ‘Best viewed with <this browser> on <that resolution>’, and it’s not too far off from the future we’ll have if the big players get their wishes. Things like google suite, whatever meta is offering and pretty much “the internet” as your Joe Average understands it wants to implement technology where it’s not possible to block ads or modify the content you’re shown in any other way. It’s not too far off from your online banking and other very much real life affecting services start to have boundaries in place where they require certain level of ‘security’ from your browser and you can bet that things which allow content modifying things, like adblocker, doesn’t qualify for the new standards.

          On many places it’s already illegal to modify or tamper DRM protected content in any ways (does anyone remember libdvdcss?) and the plan is to include similar (more or less) restrictions to the whole world wide web, which would say that we’ll have things like fediverse who allow browsers like firefox and ‘the rest’ like banking, flight/ticket/hotel/whatever booking sites, big news outlets and so on who only allow the ‘secure’ version of the browser. And that of course has very little to do with actual security, they just want control over your device and what content is fed to you, regardless if you like it or not.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Those are made on Firefox engine. That is made and maintained by the company Mozilla. Which is experiencing those problems.
          It’s like those people who say that they don’t use chrome because it’s shit and breaks privacy, they use edge and brave.

          • aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Firefox is a fully open source browser. Whether or not it fails and goes down doesn’t really matter, as its source code is out there for anyone to use, and build a browser off of it.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It kinda does matter. It’s an enormously complicated project, and it’s possible that nobody will be able to be an ultimate fork if needed.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve been dual welding browsers since chrome came out. The second they started talking about deprecating manifest 2, I test drove Vivaldi and Brave. Now they’re set up as my second.

    I tried to convert over to Libwolf, But it absolutely massacres my passkeys.

    I plan to main Firefox until they do something stupid which I think is inevitable with their recent statements.

    I’m just hoping that by the time The other Firefox shoe drops there will be something else viable on the market. I don’t know how long Brave and Vivaldi can hold out with chromium changing underneath them

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oof I was considering LW but now am worried about the passkeys. Was that from an import or a remove and recreate?

      Been meaning to try Zen but maybe I should test more before trying either

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wouldn’t trust Brave as it has a poor track record for privacy and is often used as a crypto miner behind the scenes.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s a fairly long time ago now and the crypto token crap is off by default. As far as I know they are the only browser with a paid development team that is trying to combat YouTube ads. And they’re blocking technique is unique amongst the options we have. If it comes down to using Brave for YouTube, I have no problem with doing that.

        • darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The only thing stopping me moving to Brave is the awful bookmark sync implementation… when I used it for a small period in the past it was keeping some I’d long deleted on other devices etc

          I also would prefer it to implement bookmark separators (like both Vivaldi and FF do) but I can live without those if they sorted out the sync.

        • Traister101@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yup. I always get shat on for mentioning that the crypto crap is off by default. I quite like the idea behind it, have the browser send you ads and then allow you to choose what to do with the earnings but in practice it doesn’t work so well sadly

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, sadly, bringing Brave into any browser conversation is like saying, “Please take a dump on my face.” And I get some of the vitriol. Brave would likely sell you down the river for $7 if they thought they could get away with it, but so would two-thirds of the browsers out there. Even Firefox, the last true holdout at the moment, is hungry. I hope they find a rev stream before they do something drastic.

            I like the concept of letting you choose the ads you see and earning some of the compensation. But it needs to happen at the advertiser level. I’d like a world where I pay a little to the browser, a little to the originator, and maybe get a small pool to dedicate to a site or cause I want to patronize.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s totally ok. I’ve phased Chrome out in the beginning of the year already.

  • letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    And my phaseout of Chrome is complete. My two browsers are now Firefox and Edge. Bit surprised at the latter tbh but it seems reasonably adequate as a secondary browser.

    • jsqribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yup same here Firefox for personal use and Edge for work since it deals better with all the MS sites

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My understanding is that Edge is Chromium and will also eventually be impacted by this.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Edge isn’t really better in any way. It’s both Google and Microsoft, like the marriage of awful

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Chrome is the abblock-block? You might have outblocked me today, but I’ll firefox you away!

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I feel like I have seen this news since forever, I am happily living my life with Firefox… Although the android mobile really needs some love.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh man. Once Firefox on Android got extension support, I hopped on that train so hard. No ads on mobile browser? Heck yeah.

      • Nanabaz2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It has extensions support for like 6 years at this point. Unless you got some extreme obscure extensions

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well, if my memory serves well, Ublock Origin has been in Firefox mobile for a long time already but I get you.

        Although even before I did the switch I rarely saw ads on Google because I have always used DNS ad blocking (whether using my pi-hole or AdAway root version) but yeah Ublock Origin is just so much better.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        One thing I would like is to selectively enable extensions in the “custom tab” modal for Firefox.

        When I open an article, and it’s riddled with js and auto play video, I have to hit “Open in Firefox” to get uBlock to engage.

        It would be nice to have the reader mode button in this view as well.

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          If it helps, you can dig into Androids settings and use Firefox for the default in-app browser for most apps. That’s what I did, anyway, and it’s been fantastic.

    • Acters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      i like it, tbh I barely use the phone. I need more RAM on it for it to be more useful. It’s crazy that even 8GB is not good enough. Dam Samsung bloat. I wish I had a stylus option for Google pixel or something that can take a privacy respecting OS.

      • kalpol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Samsung bloat is real. I have two identical Galaxy Tabs, one with Lineage and one stock, and the software on the stock one is so annoying to go back to after using the Lineage one.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Eh, Firefox on Android works pretty well for me (I actually use Mull). There are a handful of websites that have issues, but many of them also have issues on Vanadium (Chromium on GrapheneOS), so I just use my desktop for those.

      What issues are you running into?

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        What issues are you running into?

        Tab management is plain bad, and the UI doesn’t feel snappy as, let’s say, Cromite or Chrome.

        All those are paid off because of the extension ability in Firefox.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Really? Tab management seems largely equivalent to Chrome, and the UI feels totally fine to me. Are you on an older device perhaps? It’s a bit slow on my old phone (4 years old), but my new one (Pixel 8) is absolutely fine.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nah, my device is not high end, but it ships with a SD 865, and 6 GB of RAM.

            Have you used Chrome recently? It is just a better experience with Android, except because of the ads and shitty Google’s hand lol.

            It feels so good to have your grouped tabs always accessible at the bottom and you can quickly switch just by tapping the little icon.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’ve used Vanadium (GrapheneOS build of Chrome), which is fine. And I didn’t know about that tab grouping feature, that’s pretty nice! I tend to only have a few tabs open though, so I just swipe on the URL bar to jump between them, which works acceptably well.

              • kratoz29@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah, many of us hoard a lot of tabs, for the better for worse, but even after some simple web searches you can gather a lot of links quickly, so it is always handy to have a good tab management.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just wait, there will be “features” that are mandatory on most sites, only supported in chrome.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I usually use a useragent switcher to bypass.

        But the teams website for example opens a Microsoft specific browser api so its annoyingly locked to Edge specifically on mobile.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        So download a user agent switcher and set it to show you as using chrome. This is what i do with firefox and i haven’t run across a site that thinks i’m using firefox.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Welcome all you shiny new Firefox users. Get a cup of a hot beverage and enjoy your freedom.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Been using Firefox for as long as I can remember now. Never had a reason to switch away, and I’m feeling rather vindicated.

      • letsgo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There was a period some years ago where Firefox and Chrome were leapfrogging each other: Firefox would get slow and crap so I’d switch, then Chrome would get slow and crap and I’d switch back to FF, and so on. I’ve been on Chrome for quite a while it seems, until this development with uBO, well for me the internet is unusable without a shitblocker, so that’s the end of Chrome. Thankfully FF is up to the job.

      • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I switched to Chrome probably a decade ago, because at the time it was significantly faster. I switched to chromium at some point and ended up back on Firefox when Google’s password manager stopped working on every browser except Chrome. Firefox is noticeably faster these days and doesn’t crash as often.

  • raldone01@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t understand why all these chrome derivatives and firefox don’t just band together and extend manifest v3 with some vendored standardised extension that addresses the limitations.

    Browsers do that for CSS and JavaScript features already. An extension could just check if the browser supports the “unlimited filters” option and use it if its available.

    I have never researched it but heard that the permissions of manifest v3 are much better for privacy.

    I am in favor of removing manifest v2 if the vendored extension becomes a reality.

    Browsers already have too much complexity, lines of code and feature creep.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        From what I understand, the limit on the lists is not the only problem with it - my main concerns are a) lists only being able to update together with the extension itself and b) some features apparently being fundamentally disallowed, like the element picker I am dependent on.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Just like how Micro$oft Windows is advertsiting Linux, Google Chrome advertsites Firefox!

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sad saga, but here we are. I remember when Chrome was new and brought much needed speed and low resource usage to the browsing experience of the day. I even got email from a Chrome engineer once about a bug I mentioned in a forum, asking me for more information.

      Google was already an ad company by then so anyone could have looked forward to this inevitability. Some did. Most of us did not.

      Chrome has just always been there for some younger people but it will now live in my memory as a fully encapsulated end-to-end enshittification experience that I really should have always expected.

      And just like it used to be with Internet Explorer, I am forced to use Chrome at work all day because thats the IT & security approved / enterprise-managed browser.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I, too, switched to Chrome around when they launched due to drastically better performance. But shortly after (a couple years?), I found out Opera had similar performance and had cool other features, so I switched to that. Opera then converted to a Chrome-clone, so I switched to Firefox, which had largely caught up w/ performance by that time.

        If you have the option, request that Firefox be added to the supported app list or whatever by your IT team. Tell them you need some Firefox-specific extensions or something for your job.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Imagine having an OS that doesn’t come with a proper package manager (and Firefox installed by default, for that matter).