• Novocirab@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    As I understand you, you’re in favor of abolishing quotas for SC/ST persons, for example. In view of the large and rising income inequality and wealth inequality across the Indian population (stats), would you be open to an ambitious ‘caste-blind’ social security system, financed by taxing the rich? Or to income-based educational support programs?

    • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      For some context, I am from India too, and even rabid right wingers in my family (mostly men, for obvious reasons) don’t have a problem with reservations. The only people who tend to have a problem with those are upper caste people, who are about 30% of the population. This is a truly elitist position. I have faced casteism even in one of the most urban, educated and wealthy cities in India where I lived for a while (Bangalore) and I am not even a Dalit (the ‘untouchables’, i.e., SC/ST people). This is a hilariously out of touch position in real life, it’s more common on the internet because of the dominance of UCs and their generational privilege.

    • brown_guy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What’s caste blind social security system?

      There should income based affirmative actions, for the ones who comes in BPL (below poverty line) list and for the specially abled people

      If more than half a century of affirmative actions wasn’t able to give jobs to certain communities, then it’s a skill issue not a society issue

      Casteism doesn’t exists except in some villages, left extremists would say otherwise

      • Novocirab@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        What’s caste blind social security system?

        I am thinking of a social security system (or welfare system, or redistribution scheme, or tax scheme) which does not take caste into consideration, but only factors such as income, wealth, parental income and wealth, illnesses and disabilities, …

        In Europe and other Western countries, discontent about immigrants (and their descendants) is on the rise because people who struggle give them the blame for their own hardships, and a lot of politicians gain power by appealing to these sentiments, yet the policies that they then enact just make the rich richer and the poor even poorer.

        Could something analogous be going on in India (with the lower castes in the place of immigrants), in that the ultra-rich people manage to avoid paying taxes commensurate to their wealth by making public policy debate focus on DEI or affirmative action programs?

        • brown_guy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Could something analogous be going on in India (with the lower castes in the place of immigrants), in that the ultra-rich people manage to avoid paying taxes commensurate to their wealth by making public policy debate focus on DEI or affirmative action programs?

          Yes that’s what happens in here

          The kind of social security system you’re talking about would be the best for India. But that would take 3-4 decades to be fully functional considering the usual rise in communal riots

          But neither of the parties (BJP or Congress) would do that because they just want to make the votebank happy who are mostly the uneducated ones in towns, slums and villages

          The politics in this country is fkn cinema atp! They wouldn’t spend a single penny for the ones who think rationally before voting someone