• uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    no touchscreen

    Sounds like a dream. Or public transport. It doesn’t have touchscreen either.

  • jaykrown@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 minutes ago

    The design is bad. The front trunk is a bad use of space, and the Japanese figured this out decades ago with the Kei truck. If you want to see real utility, look at this design.

    • BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      Americans won’t buy a Kei truck though. Granted, the frunk is a marketing concession, but it’s a fine one, if it can help push the market away from huge and expensive SUVs.

      Or, more succinctly, don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

      • isaaclw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Hm. Interesting point.

        Maybe as we move our economy away from cars, and people dont all have to be drivers, we could also move away from cars that are poorly designed specifically around bad drivers.

      • jaykrown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        Then why do they allow them in Japan? Because are you admitting US drivers are fucking stupid?

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    This is cool, except you’ll never be able to guarantee it’ll make it to market to specification. They should try a small form factor too, with the same 2 seat option, even giving you the option to make a kei truck-esque experience.

    Overall, looks solid.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    The msrp of this truck is $28000. For having nothing in it that is absurd. Not to mention the rebates put it at 20k but you still have to pay upfront which deters most people from getting. Overall shit truck, shit design, shit price.

  • etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I find this minimalism strangely appealing. Unfortunately, I do not live on a farm. I hope this thing is useful to those who do, though.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I pretty much do and I’m kinda stoked, cautiously

      If I can have a Linux truck that works and can tow something if need be… I’m dowm

      • admin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        Linux truck

        And has to resemble the late 1970s-1980s body styles because of the kiss methodology. I’d love me a 1972 C10 or a 1981 F150 with Debian.

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I live in a rural area and need to do truck stuff frequently (ex. We have no trash pickup and have to haul it ourselves to the dump). Something like this is very appealing to me. I could also see this being useful as a fleet vehicle that doesn’t really leave campus grounds (think facilities/grounds/maintenance).

    • j0ester@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 minutes ago

      We’re owning the libs now! Now we can all buy any EV we want! It’s all computer.

  • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Perfect except for it being a truck. Why is North America allergic to small cars?

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      I have an answer for this that’s from my personal life if that’s helpful.

      I’ve lived either in the great plains or in the rural south my entire life, and I only found out a year ago you can pay $20 to rent a pickup truck. So up until that point, I thought, every group (of friends or family) has to have a person with a truck in it, in case someone needs to move, or in case of an emergency (like a tornado effing up their house and now you have to clear the property).

      When I found out that renting a truck is so cheap, I was so mad! All that time wasted paying extra for more car than I needed! I prefer something small and cheap and efficient, personally, but so does everyone else I know so I always wound up with the truck. (And I helped a LOT of people move over the years as a result.)

      Obviously this is n=1 but at least it’s my story? And my answer is legit, “ignorance and being too poor to own my house, and landlords like to jack rent on someone staying in one place every year so you have to keep moving to avoid that needless creep of fees.”

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      My hope is this will be another nail in the coffin for the giant bro dozers. Everybody I know who does actual real truck stuff have been crying for this exact vehicle for years. A small (in American terms) utilitarian vehicle for getting your truck stuff done. Essentially an American kei truck

      Plus I think there have been a lot of small smart-car sized EV offerings, but I can’t really think of a small truck besides the Telo truck.

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        42 minutes ago

        Sure but not every single person needs a truck? My comment isn’t even intending to hate on trucks, I literally just want a small car that’s electric. I don’t drive often and I want something that’s electric but doesn’t take up much space

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    No stereo is fine if it has ports for me to just buy my own car stereo kit and add it afterwards. I don’t see the point of no paint, like don’t you need it to protect the metal from the environment

      • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        I see, are there any other all plastic mass market cars out there, I’m just not sure how that material holds up in terms of wear and tear and accidents

        • ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 minutes ago

          Look up Saturn plastic body panels. The hood, roof, and top of the trunk we’re still metal.

          I had one as my first car. I got rear ended once, and the plastic parts were mostly fine (a little paint chipped off), but the metal top got bent. The trunk itself worked and I never fixed the metal.

          Edit to add: the car was made in 1999, I think I bought it in 2008 and had it for about ten years. I got rid of it because the electronics were getting gremlins. Neither the paint on the plastic or metal panels had issues except for the mentioned fender bender.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      While I’m with you it’s far too late. We’ve got decades if not centuries of infrastructure construction to get anywhere else. There are needs for trucks, and a barebones electric one is real good thing

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        I introduce you to innovative tech called “megapod”:

        More innovation and overfeeding CEOs entrepreneurship will create experience called “gigapod”:

    • CMonster@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yes, because the ability to move yourself and useful things over large parts of the world is so detrimental.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hell yes, take my money. As long as it’s not a limit and manages to keep its range and I can get parts fuck yes

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You know, I like the design. If I can take a wrench to it and customise it or repair broken stuff easily and for cheap, even better.

      The range is kinda meh, but for working in remote sites, bringing a diesel generator is already par for the course, and that bed looks like it fits a lot of stuff.

      No stereo sucks though.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I often drive long distances for work, and I NEVER listen to the radio. All my listening is through headphones off my phone. I even keep a spare pair charging at all times. Not only does it sound a million times better than any crappy car system, it’s far easier to take phone calls. I hate holding my phone while driving. It’s also easier to hear the map navigation lady.

        • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          All my listening [in my car] is through headphones off my phone.

          This is unsafe at best. Illegal at worst.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Nonsense, how is it either?

            Too loud? I’m a musician, I value my hearing, so I don’t play anything too loud. I always use earbuds, so I can always hear emergency vehicles. Besides, I’ve heard plenty of car speaker systems that were loud enough to block out sirens easily.

            Illegal? In what way? In states that have banned holding phones, they encourage hands-free phone calls. If speaking on the phone is considered a distraction, then why isn’t speaking to another passenger, or listening to music? Both would be just as distracting as a hands free call. Modern cars all connect to a cell phone automatically, and take calls through the speaker system. If it’s illegal, then why are car companies allowed to install them as standard equipment? I don’t use that system only because I like the audio quality of my ear buds far more.

            By your logic, sound systems and phones in cars should just be totally illegal.

            • pahlimur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              In most states that don’t have specific laws about them its considered distracted driving. I wouldn’t wear them because it opens you up to legal scrutiny if you do fuck up while driving. Insurance will throw you under the bus the moment they can prove you had headphones on.

            • easily3667@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              It’s often illegal to have headphones on both ears.

              I don’t know why you’re trying to claim it shouldn’t be illegal to a random internet stranger. Most things that are illegal shouldn’t be, but the HOA types that care about rules are also the ones who want to fuck rules so bad they get into positions of power. So if you want to fix it, go be a rule fucker. Or Luigi the rule fuckers.

              It’s a lot easier to block out emergency sirens at normal volume levels vs the stereo where you have to have already lost your hearing before it’s loud enough to block a siren. The counterpoint to this is when the siren is actually in the music, which is why I don’t listen to certain rap while driving anymore.

              • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                34 minutes ago

                Only 6 states ban headphones in both ears.

                I’ve driven hundreds of thousands of miles, and never had anyone question it. I’m not stopping now.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Headphones are considered like ear plugs. A tendency to block out surrounding noises like horns and sirens.

              • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                45 minutes ago

                I use earbuds, not headphones, but use the terms interchangeably. I don’t have any problems hearing emergency vehicles. If you are using them so loudly you can’t hear sirems, then you are going to go deaf soon anyway, and by your logic, deaf people shouldn’t be allowed to drive, right?

                And whether you can hear properly or not, it’s still not illegal.

        • CMonster@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Your car just has a shitty sound system in it. That experience is in no way representative of most vehicles. I drive almost 200 miles a day.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            I spent much of my career in the music business, with a significant portion in the audiophile audio business. ALL car stereo systems are a shitty compromise to real high quality audio.

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’d build a mount for my DeWalt speaker that I’m already taking to my job sites who cares about a stereo

      • Civil_Liberty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The past is prologue. If this startup was happening in any other country I would give it a chance. But it has zero chance of success here because of… checks notes… greed, corruption, weaponization of venture capital, weaponization of regulatory state and many many more.

          • Civil_Liberty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            49 minutes ago

            Believe it or not, some people will spend money to gain a position of power to run a company into the ground. If you cant just buy it and kill it, you make sure someone gets near the levers of power to run it into the ground.

    • demunted@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Agree. Elon… Err Doge will change regulatory rules until they run out of money.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Here is where Bezos makes sense. He is also evil, but he’s actually smart, and can take on Elon. The last thing Elon needs right now is Bezos head on.