• werty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Prude shaming is exactly the same as slut shaming. Implicit in your comment is the notion that women ought to be perfectly fine with deepfake porn of themselves being created and viewed by anyone, but society has made them prudish through the demonization of nudity sex.

    Women are people and have rights and feelings that should not be ignored simply to serve the male sex drive, and a great many women do not want to be deepfake porn stars. If you disagree then say so. Don’t hide behind the notion that society has robbed women of their desire to serve your fantasy through the demonization of sex. Sexual liberation includes the right to not have or be involved in sexual activity if one chooses. Prude shaming, like yours, is designed to remove that right.

    No wonder 4b took off in Korea.

    • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Succinct, says the quiet part out loud, and it has me exploring my own assumptions.

      Thanks for being a part of this community.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Society subjects people to a lot of things that people aren’t “perfectly fine with” but only some of them have wider implications for reputation, career chances, ostracizing,… and that is the main problem with this kind of technology.

      Your assumption that people need deepfake technology to fantasize about people sexually who have no interest in being on the receiving end of that is at best naive and at worst arguing in bad faith.

      • werty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        and that is the main problem with this kind of technology.

        In your opinuon.

        Your assumption that people need deepfake technology to fantasize about people sexually who have no interest in being on the receiving end of that is at best naive and at worst arguing in bad faith.

        I never assumed or suggested any such thing. You are making shit up.