Voyajer@lemmy.world to RetroGaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoWii Homebrew Community "Built On Lies And Copyright Infringement"www.timeextension.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1129arrow-down17
arrow-up1122arrow-down1external-linkWii Homebrew Community "Built On Lies And Copyright Infringement"www.timeextension.comVoyajer@lemmy.world to RetroGaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squaredaggermoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-210 days agoThey also stole foss code though Edit: The above statement is probably untrue
minus-squareSturgist@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 days agohttps://lemmy.ca/comment/16203696 According to the comment posted above…they didn’t?
minus-squareSturgist@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 days agoNo worries dude. At least you didn’t double down! 👍
minus-squaredaggermoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 days agoI’d like to think I’m big enough to admit when I’m wrong
minus-squareNikls94@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 days agoHow can one steal foss code if it’s free and open source?
minus-squarefernandofig@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-210 days agoNot quite “steal”, but they removed license and attribution information, which is a no-no and license infringement for sure. But yeah, this is all of no consequence. Edit: I just read DacoTaco’s post below. Looks like there was no direct code liftup from RTEMS then, so I guess it’s even more of a fuss over nothing.
minus-squaredaggermoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 days agoThey repackage it as proprietary in violation of the license
They also stole foss code though
Edit: The above statement is probably untrue
https://lemmy.ca/comment/16203696
According to the comment posted above…they didn’t?
My bad
No worries dude. At least you didn’t double down! 👍
I’d like to think I’m big enough to admit when I’m wrong
How can one steal foss code if it’s free and open source?
Not quite “steal”, but they removed license and attribution information, which is a no-no and license infringement for sure.
But yeah, this is all of no consequence.
Edit: I just read DacoTaco’s post below. Looks like there was no direct code liftup from RTEMS then, so I guess it’s even more of a fuss over nothing.
They repackage it as proprietary in violation of the license