You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.
The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.
You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.
No, I’m not, I’m saying look at the sources provided to you
The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.
deleted by creator
Wikipedia is not a source.
No one is trying to deny gay people are a thing.
The sources in Wikipedia are
So provide those sources along with what part of them you’re actually talking about.
Which laws specifically?
You see them. They were provided to you.
I don’t see them, because I don’t go to wikipedia links and look for a needle in a haystack to support your argument.
You provide the links to the laws that you think support your argument.
my argument? Lol no. Also it’s not a needle in a hay stack, everything is neatly listed at the bottom haha.
deleted by creator
You’re arguing that I should go and find my own examples of something that I am arguing isn’t happening, rather than the person making the argument that it is providing actual examples. That’s not how conversations and arguments work.
The original person, or yourself, can provide evidence to back up the original claim. It’s not my job to go and guess what exact part of what link you’re talking about.
You as in the person who is making the argument.
No, I’m not, I’m saying look at the sources provided to you
It’s there, the entire wiki is about the subject