If a niche community has people that persistently downvote every post

  1. is that healthy for the community?
  2. is that healthy for lemmy in general?

Examples that come to mind are political communities, linus tech tips, diet communities, etc. There will be a group of people who will not make comments, posts, but will strictly downvote everything that is in the community.

This is a continuation of a discussion @[email protected] and I started elsewhere, but it deserves it’s own space for meta-moderation discussion.

  • jet@hackertalks.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    My personal view - its a net negative,

    for the community itself. It is a chilling effect, discouraging people from posting. Yes the votes don’t matter, but they are a social signal, and people (especially infrequent posters) can be hyper sensitive to that.

    For Lemmy as a whole, I think its also a net negative, people only participating to rain on other peoples parade isn’t driving engagement (see above), but it means their feed is filled with posts they don’t like, reducing the quality and interaction of their experience.

    Possible Solutions:

    1. Ability to voluntarily unlist from the ALL feed for niche communities.

    2. Moderation bot that looks at strictly negative interactions in a community and help those users “block” the community. i.e. someone who never posts comments, or ever finds anything positive in the community.

    Thoughts @[email protected] ?

    Context - Right now I moderate two communities that are basically my personal journals, since they are so niche and don’t really get alot of interaction, but… it is lots of content for lemmy which I think is a net positive for the platform.

    • celeste@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If I’m making the effort to comment or post on topic in a community which mostly gets posts from one or two people, and i get immediate downvotes, I’m going to assume that’s a signal I broke an unwritten rule. I probably wouldn’t try posting there again.

      • jet@hackertalks.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        People who run instances can see the votes already, so we can automate some possible solutions now.

        Thanks for the reference to the previous discussion, I had no idea.

        One possible response to this would be a slashdot style system where you only get a few downvotes randomly assigned in a interval, so you have to be choosy with them.

        • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          People who run instances can see the votes already, so we can automate some possible solutions now.

          It’s definitely doable, that would probably help a few mods.

          One possible response to this would be a slashdot style system where you only get a few downvotes randomly assigned in a interval, so you have to be choosy with them.

          Indeed