From my understanding the last time I looked into this the way it works is that the printed model inherits the license. That means you can’t sell cc-noncommercial models directly, but if someone contracts a print shop and provides the model they can still pay someone to make it due to paying for a service and not that product.
Though print shops seem to flagrantly violate this anyway without much issue.
Good question!
It looks like Creative Commons non-commercial, according to the download page.
So no reselling. I wonder if that prevents print shops from renting use of their 3d printers from a customer who doesn’t own a 3d printer.
From my understanding the last time I looked into this the way it works is that the printed model inherits the license. That means you can’t sell cc-noncommercial models directly, but if someone contracts a print shop and provides the model they can still pay someone to make it due to paying for a service and not that product.
Though print shops seem to flagrantly violate this anyway without much issue.
I think its a gray area that will always be dependent on the geography, lawyers, and the judge.