• FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    LGBT Rights are based and cool

    depends, but in general they are

    and anyone who unironically uses the term “Biological Male” is not arguing in good faith

    I disagree on this

    • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      “biological male” is if anything bad description of reality. A trans woman who has been on hormone therapy for a couple of years is biologically closer to cisgender women than cisgender men. And even more so if they’ve had surgeries. But usually people who use that term don’t care and lump everyone who was assigned male at birth into that category.

      I could attribute this term to ignorance because it sounds reasonable, but it’s far too often used to exclude trans women from spaces that other women belong

      • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a beautiful way of seeing it indeed, you convinced me

        My point was just to say that in very specific cases it can be used to make it clear that the person is born male but I guess the cisgender and transgender terms are now relatively well known

        It’s still easier to explain some things with this word, but I wouldn’t use it socially of course

        You nailed the problem: it is often used for bad reasons and thus people categorize people saying this word, which is highly invalid imo and shouldn’t be criminalized this way when the context is appropriate

        But yea, now even scientific literature pretty much abandoned this word