Apple is facing a near-£3bn lawsuit over claims it breached competition law by effectively locking millions of UK consumers into its cloud storage service at “rip-off” prices.

  • PNW_Doug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t get it. I mean, their free tier is a bit chintzy, but I give 'em a dollar a month and get 50GB. You can get 2TB for 3 bucks. This hardly seems a ripoff.

    • Gloria@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      For me (europe) it is:

      • 2,99 = 50GB
      • 9,99 = 2TB

      Everyone with a family or social life has between 20-200GB photos and videos. Notice how there is no plan for 5,99 = 1TB. You either do not back up everything and pay 3€, or you pay a tener per month to have a cloud storage that is always 50-70% empty but still have to pay for.

      I will be the first to leave Apple iCloud if there is a viable solution that works like apples own OS integration without jumping through hoops and losing albums and meta data

    • Darth_Mew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t get it either, what does perceived affordability have to do with a “monopoly”?

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not the price that is the problem, it’s how iCloud is integrated into the device, in a way Apple don’t allow other cloud services to do. iCloud has access other apps simply do not, so they cannot compete fairly.

        • astrsk@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          What? You can host your own nextcloud instance and use it in the files app as a storage location and have all the same “save to” and “Read from” actions for documents that iCloud has. I use that and smb shares regularly and the only apps that don’t work with it are the ones who choose not to implement the apis for it. How is it monopolistic if Apple’s 1st party apps and software only work with their 1st party storage offering while allowing anyone to use the system api’s to connect and access any other storage service they want? Is it just them complaining that you can’t backup photos to anything but iCloud (except you can, by plugging it into any computer locally)? I really don’t understand, legitimately.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Having to regularly plug your phone into a PC to back up 100GB+ of photos and videos over a USB 2 connection is not even remotely the same as automatic backups to iCloud that you can then access instantly, at any time, anywhere.

          • Romkslrqusz@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            except you can, by plugging it into a computer locally

            That’s not even remotely close to being the same as the experience iCloud offers.

            • astrsk@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 hours ago

              So don’t use iCloud and the photos app? What’s the problem here? There are plenty of third party camera apps and photo managers that could all use the same apis to access your directly integrated nextcloud storage the same way the photos app works. Hell, Plex offers automatic photo backups to your plex server! Y’all need to actually explain what this monopoly claim is in better detail. What am I not understanding here?