• Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    regardless, these states[emphasis mine] did engage in genocide against dissidents and minorities, which you cannot deny.

    I don’t deny it, I just disagree that those actions are attributable to the economic system. The economic system of communism is fine, it’s the marxist conception of the intelligentsia seizing the state and establishing a “dictatorship of the proletariat” that leads to problems. The responsible party for genocide is the state that carried it out, not communism. If not in the name of communism, they would have done so in the name of some other belief system.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The US invaded Iraq for the sake of “democracy,” in their own words. Did “democracy” kill all those Iraqis, or did the US government?

        Edit: changed “freedom and liberty” to “democracy” for better clarity and accuracy.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Freedom and liberty isn’t an economic system that requires the previous system to die.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The revolution was justified, the subsequent oppression was not. Both were done in the name of communism but the revolution failed to achieve it and the state never actually meant it.

            I changed “freedom and liberty” to “democracy” in my comment above to make my point more clear. While democracy is a political system and not an economic one, it does require the previous system to die in order to be established.