• irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Much like book bans in school libraries that have moved to city libraries and all the other bans that started in schools, this will soon move from bans on children getting healthcare, to bans on adults getting healthcare once they use the “save the children” rhetoric to make their followers comfortable with the prejudices in general.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The frustrating part of all of this is that it is true that puberty blockers aren’t approved by the FDA for delaying puberty for gender affirming treatments, but it is used anyway as an off-label use. Criticism of off-label uses of pharmaceuticals is a perfectly valid concern to have.

    But if you actually had this concern in good faith, you would be putting pressure on the FDA to investigate this use of puberty blockers directly and make a call or whether or not this is an approved use. You would be demanding that the FDA fill in the gaps in their knowledge, and only allow this use of puberty blockers if there was no harm found.

    Going straight to the legislature and banning it outright is underhanded as shit. The only reason to do that is because you know that the FDA has no reason to disapprove of this use, and you want to medically oppress trans people regardless of what the science actually says.

    It’s transphobic bullshit, and anyone telling you that their concern is the safety and welfare of children is lying to you, because if that were true they would act like it.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think this one is more difficult than it sounds.

      You are asking if someone should have the right to make a life long decision, before they have matured enough to make a life long decision. Tie that in with parents who can both have their child’s best interests at heart, or their own preconceived religion and views on it and there is no wide reaching decision that is best for everyone.

      Saying that, they would have said no regardless of the discussions and best interests of the individual. These discussions need to be had, but quietly pretty fucking confident they won’t happen in the next 4 years.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        The problem is that, in this situation, no decision IS a decision.

        Up until puberty, boys and girls are quite similar. It’s puberty that causes the lifelong changes. We already know that delaying puberty doesn’t cause long-term issues. Puberty blockers are used to treat or help with other conditions. By blocking puberty, you are buying time. Time for the child to mature. Time for phycologists to assess. Time to practice the role before locking it in permanently. Time to grow, learn, and make the very decision you are talking about.

      • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        Puberty blockers are reversible - that’s not a lifelong decision. That information should have been in the article, and if we didn’t live in a dumbshit rightwing dystopia where press is owned by the conservatives and also fears retribution from the conservatives, that information would’ve been in there.

        Surgery? Sure, let’s have that conversation - though I would certainly argue it’s not the state’s business what happens between a child, their parents, and their doctors, any more than it would be any other lifelong medical procedure. But it’s at least a little murky. But this decision isn’t surgery, it’s puberty blockers. Not murky. Just evil.

      • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Puberty blockers aren’t life long. Puberty is. These parents aren’t trying to give their kids sex change operations. They’re trying to give their kids a chance to make those decisions for themselves.

  • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Everyone who isn’t a cis het white Republican should just leave America. They clearly don’t want anyone else there, let the babies have their stupid bottle.

    Once they are alone, they might eat each other and we will be rid of these stupid people.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I try not to get to political because there are two sides to every story especially regarding gender since it inherently should not be a political issue at all but…

    Good, we should not have any kind of gender reassignment treatments or surgery’s until the brain is %100 developed and the person can be %100 sure it is there life long decision and understand all the consequences. You know like with any contract, major life decision or medical decision.

    This has the potential to alter developing minds and there politically biased parents do not have the ability to make a proper medical decision. Half the time they don’t have the ability to make proper life saving choices let alone elective surgeries/treatments.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      I was a transgender child. Going through forced puberty led me to attempt suicide at 14 15 and 18. Parts of my body are covered in self-harm scars due in large part to the utter repulsion I felt at the effects of testosterone on my body. I became an alcoholic at 16, and an oxycontin addict by the time I was 20.

      I am extremely lucky to be alive. I have had to spend tens of thousands of dollars undoing the harm testosterone did to me and some things I never will. I could have avoided all of this if I had had access to puberty blockers.

      Is forcing us to go through what I went through humane? When a real treatment exists right there? When studies show a less than 1% rate of regret for gender affirmative care for minors? Do you realize you are forcing children to go through what I went through? Do you realize not every child will survive? Do you realize you’re supporting causes that kill children?

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        stop usibg [sic] ur brain and thinking for yourself

        You don’t need to tell them to do that, they clearly already did before commenting. But then, so did you.

    • hope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Going through the wrong puberty is also a life long decision with major consequences. Hope that helps!

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ok, and you can trust politicians parents and children to choose the right gender? We have the same choice no matter if we ban or allow this, the only differences is:

        1. Politically motivated people can weigh in.
        2. the amount of people suffering right now is overwhelmingly lower than the people who have the potential to be misgendered and given the wrong drugs.
        • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          27 minutes ago

          Holy shit you have absolutely no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, so please shut the fuck up about your uninformed personal opinions.

          Puberty blockers only delay the onset of puberty until you stop taking them, at which point development resumes normally with far less downsides than the risk of developing undesired sex characteristics. So no, this is not “the same choice no matter if we ban or allow this.” The same choice would be starting actual sex hormones; puberty blockers are the middle ground here.

          Banning puberty blockers is politically motivated actors putting their politics above people’s bodily autonomy and medical professionals’ ability to make medically informed decisions.

          You’re flat out wrong that allowing doctors to prescribe puberty blockers would cause risk of greater suffering in such a way as to make it abundantly clear that you don’t know what those meds actually do.

          You are a fucking moron. Username checks out.

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You know damn well this isn’t about surgery. It’s about hormones, and it says so right there in the summary. You didn’t even have to click the link. Nobody is doing breast implants on trans minors (only on cis minors, which is perfectly fine for some reason).

      Forcing a trans kid to go through the wrong puberty even though they know they are trans is extremely traumatic. It’s life ruining. It alters the voice, the shape of the torso, the shape of the face, and facial and body hair in ways that either can’t be fixed at all, or can only be fixed with expensive surgeries later on.

      And if you want people to be absolutely sure about their status before going on hormone replacement therapy, then that is exactly what puberty blockers are for. Leuprorelin prevents puberty so that the kid can figure themself out for a year or two, and then make sure they go through the correct puberty. Even if they decide not to be transgender in the end, they can just go off leuprorelin and start puberty.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Quite frankly IDGAF, it is going to alter the kids minds and body and I trust absolutely nobody on this planet to make that decision without bias and political interference and influence. And the amount of people who legitimately need these hormones is far far less than the people who will be given politically motivated or poorly informed or poorly thought out, you are risking an epidemic of the exact thing you are trying to avoid. This is unethical and should not be politicized.

        • 3 dogs in a trenchcoat@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 hour ago

          You’re against things that alter kids minds and bodies? Like puberty? Well luckily there’s a way to stop that! Puberty blockers, which have been safely used for decades and are considered a medical necessity by WPATH as well as many other health organizations!

        • maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Why are we debating this at all, shouldn’t it be the decision of the parents? You don’t agree, that’s fine, you can tell your kids no. If someone else looks at the evidence and believes it’s true, and believes this is hugely beneficial to their kid, why should the government have a say in their kid’s medical treatment?

          • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Parents are the absolute worst people to make decisions of their children’s medical decisions they are just the default, in a perfect world we would have a body of politically isolated experts determining medical decisions for children. But we don’t live in that world so until we do we should have as few elective medical treatment’s on children as possible.

            • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 minutes ago

              By politically isolated I’m going to assume you just mean conversion therapists who will try to convince children they are not gay or trans. Because if you’re not giving them affirmative care and listening to them the alternative is denying them.

              Conversion therapy kills people. That’s what it does. That’s all it does. It is NOT possible to stop someone from being gay or trans. It has never been shown to be possible in any fucking way. Conversion therapy does not work, has never worked, and is equivalent in mental distress to severe psychological torture. It frequently involves physical and sexual assault. It involves emotional abuse and manipulation. All in service of forcing us to conform. This is the alternative. If you’re against affirmative care this is what you’re for. Think about telling these people that what happened to them was right. Think about going to the lived ones of people who took their lives while undergoing conversion therapy. Think about telling them that what happened is right and should be legal. This is what you’re advocating for. This is the side that you’re on.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “I’m not going to get political but”

      “Gets political”

      “Spouts off right wing talking points”

      “Demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of the transition process”

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I did not say I am not going to. the point of that statement is to point out how abnormal it is for me to weigh in on a political issue and how egregious I believe this to be, and I absolutely do not care if it is right left up or down, this should not be politicized, it is human experimentation.

        • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Hi, I’m a trans woman and I just wanna say that the name you chose for yourself suits you really well well!

            • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Hey, I just like how you picked out your name. It’s a compliment. Why do you gotta be so toxic about yourself? Is it the brain full of hatred? I bet it’s the brain full of hatred.

              Best of luck with *gestures at everything*.

              Consider possibly not making trans peoples’ lives harder, yeah? Don’t contribute to that.

              • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                And that is picking a fight also not a valid argument.

                As for making trans lives worse quite frankly your life is less important than children. You wanted a fight right?

                • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Hey, chum, I’m just trying to be uplifting, you wanna come at me with fights, I’m trying to give you a compliment. No wonder you’re not getting laid if you try to fight every woman who says something nice about you.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Trans erasure in action.

    I hope denying healthcare to children was worth owning the libs.