The linked post shows how most non-tech people’s understanding of email is very very different from most of the people here.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    I’m really disappointed with Lemmy’s idea of federation: all it is is a bunch of servers mirroring one another, but the user accounts are server-bound. No jumping instance and taking your identity seamlessly with you.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      This isn’t really Lemmy’s idea of federation, it’s just ActivityPub, the underlying protocol. Having a mechanism for jumping servers is unfortunately quite complicated and it isn’t clear how it should be done or if it is even possible.

      Lemmy does allow you to export and import your settings though, so you can kinda do it but you lose your history.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        AFAIK the Nostr protocsal sorta let’s you hop around, but it’s full to the brimwith cryptobros, and I’m still not sure how moderation works there.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Yea moderation becomes a big problem once you can’t actually block people. I don’t like that Nostr describes itself as censorship resistent or even censorship free, that’s not a good quality.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            I’m not very familiar with Nostr, but knowing other distributed protocols, you can just hide messages from selected users in client.

            censorship resistent or even censorship free, that’s not a good quality.

            Also, wtf did I read?

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              Censorship-free implies that moderation is impossible. If you don’t have moderation, your social media will turn into a Nazi bar.

              you can just hide messages from selected users in client

              That’s not good enough. First of all, users don’t want to have to block people before having a good experience. Users don’t want to deal with moderation themselves, but they also don’t want mean people, harassment and nazis. It’s not easy to recruit moderators for online forums, not a lot of people want to deal with that stuff.

              But secondly, client-level blocking is not effective. It does not stop those bad users from continuing their bad behavior. In the case of Lemmy, it also doesn’t stop their votes from still affecting your feed.

              So yes, censorship-free platforms are not good because censorship-free means moderation-free, and users don’t want that.