The country is not going to look the same in 3 years, this list is useless.
NO. Please fuck off for three years.
Any list that still includes Kamala Harris can be immediately discounted.
And Fetterman. Surprised they didn’t include Hillary.
1,000%
Jesus, they actually listed Kamala Harris as #4 to run again…
They listed Fetterman. It’s a bad joke. Even the larger party is backing away from that asshole.
I got downvoted on R for pointing out Fetterman’s voting record on things like Kristi Noem’s nomination. He’s a lost cause and basically the new Joe Manchin.
deleted by creator
Buddy, we ain’t making it there at this point. We’re going to have to literally drag Trump out of the oval office, or have him wheeled out after too many hamberders for his wretched heart.
Nope. Republican-lite is (still) unappealing to everybody.
Ok, so none of these. Who does Bezos consider unacceptable?
deleted by creator
It’s certainly a list of people who have demonstrated a willingness to move to the right. So it’s probably gonna be one of them. Most likely Newsom or Buttigieg.
How does that saying go? Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results?
deleted by creator
I don’t think that’s accurate. Science does rely on repeatable experimentation, but if an experiment fails to verify your hypothesis, you either change the experiment or change your hypothesis.
deleted by creator
Kind of, but you generally don’t “expect different results” as the phrase goes. If anything you expect similar results and different results indicate something might have been done wrong. So science uses repeats to validate results, basically the opposite of the saying.
Yikes.
Warnock isn’t awful. But we need someone who can actually present an argument for their election. AoC will be old enough, right?
AOC hit 35 like 2 weeks before the '24 election.
