• TammyTobacco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’m a proponent to legalize murder of anyone with a net worth of $1 bn or more. It would make the rich have to make some decisions.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Bullshit

      Stop the calls for killing the rich. Don’t blame people for playing the game, just change the rules. Tax the rich for all they have until everyone lives in a tops 1-5 ratio of networth. All of the sudden, poverty gone, we can do universal healthcare easily, government will have boat loads for anything to make our lives better

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I have been saying something slightly similar, but rather that laws should no longer protect them.

    • BigBenis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      This violence-against-the-owning class rhetoric is going too far. Killing other humans is never justified. Tax them into oblivion and make them work for a living like the rest of us. There’s a massive difference between having disdain for billionaires and wanting to kill them.

        • BigBenis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          I’d wager we have a much better shot at passing legislation for a billionaire tax than legalizing murder.

      • jaek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Killing other humans is often justified. For instance, it would be completely justified to kill someone who was in the process of shooting up a school.

        In the same way, billionaires are guilty of causing the deaths of millions of people through their hoarding of necessities. Killing the billionaires would allow this wealth to be redistributed, saving potentially millions of lives.

        • BigBenis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          I think the difference is that a school shooter is in the middle of a violent act and is an immediate threat to the lives of anybody around them. Usually the only way to put an end to the harm they’re causing is to meet that violence with the same level of violence. It’s not a just act, it’s a tragedy, but it’s ultimately necessary to prevent further injustice.

          Hoarding an incomprehensible amount of resources and lobbying for a system is easier to exploit is amoral and causes harm to our society but it is not a violent act and is not an immediate threat to anybody’s life.

          These memes spreading violent rhetoric against a class of people this community is at odds with is starting to feel like other corners of the internet that I don’t want to be involved in.

      • pinkystew@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        they’re so nice, so surely everybody else is too

        This right here.

        I think many poor people do not realize how deliberately cruel the rich are being. They cannot imagine someone looking at a whiteboard planning debilitating poverty and misery for millions of people. They think that the situation is unfortunate and unavoidable somehow, and not deliberately made.