• john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It’s just speculation. I don’t know, I could be wrong, but I’d wager I’m right.

    Do you think there’s not a statistically significant amount of whistleblowers who are liars?

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Uhh, no. I didn’t say it was true, I said I think it would be true.

        If you equate that to “talking out of my ass” then you need to work on your reading comprehension.

    • optissima@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think there’s not enough evidence to prove that, so no. Why would you lie in the way that you’re most likely going to be killed from?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I cannot possibly say but what I would say is that there is a significantly higher likelihood than what he is saying is correct. Given that you basically can prove it for yourself by simply asking the AI to quote copyrighted content, the fact that it can do that rather demonstrates that copyright content was acquired illegally, and if the copyright holders never talked to openAI, then openAI by definition never got permission.

      It’s weird that you would assume malice on everyone’s behalf by default, what would they have to gain by it?

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s weird that you would assume malice on everyone’s behalf by default, what would they have to gain by it?

        Can you read? I never assumed malice on everyone’s behavior. I said a statistically significant amount.