• _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 days ago

    Nothing in existence that has been labeled AI is AI. If AI (actual meaning of the words) exists, it’s in some secret facility and we don’t know about it. AI outside of fiction is a meaningless marketing term. That was already the case before LLMs and stable diffusion.

      • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        No. That’s another bullshit marketing term people came up with when confronted with the fact that their “AI” contains no I.

        • MurrayL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          No, it’s a term that creates a meaningful distinction between what you seem to think AI means and what it actually means.

          If you refuse to accept either term then I can only assume you’re just being stubborn for the sake of it.

          • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            A distinction necessitated by marketing abusing it and watering it down beyond usefulness. Rinse and repeat and we’ll be talking about SAAGAITSRI (super advanced actual general artificial intelligence that shows real intelligence) in 10 to 20 years.

      • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Let’s go ahead and call Trump’s politics “liberal justice”. It’s all just meaningless words that we can associate with whatever we want. That’s more along the lines of how “AI” is used in marketing.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Or maybe we can accept that language is fluid and what you want something to mean and what everyone else thinks it means are in no way the same and never will be.

          That said, Trump is 100% a classical liberal so I’m highly amused that was the example you decided to go with.