Dude… I’m not digging through years worth of comments across several social media platforms and accounts on each just to satisfy your purposelessly sad need for attention.
So if as a result of this. you are left with no other choice than to accuse me of lying because I’m not playing along with your little internet rule of “you have to prove what you say or I get to call you a liar!” bullshit, then be my guest. But I’m an adult. I don’t play by nonsense childish internet rules and I don’t appease trolls.
Now, having explained my stance on the issue, I can expect you’ll exercise your compulsion to have the last word and call me a liar again?
I think it’s another example of “internet bubbles” - people with similar views tend to congregate together and this is particularly true on the internet, when going elsewhere is always just a mouse-click away.
When ChatGPT first launched, Lemmy was still pretty much a ghost town, and it did cause a lot of optimistic excitement e.g. on reddit. Lemmy got a big surge in numbers when reddit did its infamous API changes - enshittification driven by spez’s and other reddit executives’ insatiable lust to exploit the site for more and more money.
Perhaps for this reason, people on Lemmy are more averse to the enshittification trend and generally exploitive nature of large tech companies. I think this is what people on Lemmy object to - tech companies’ concentration of power and profits by ripping off the general public - not so much the concept of LLMs themselves, but the fact they could easily be used to further inequality in society.
The claim was that people on lemmy treated openai as saints when chatgpt first came out, I never saw anything like that and I’ve been here for 5 years. https://lemmy.ml/u/communist
i’ve never seen this on lemmy, other places, sure, but not once on lemmy.
Yes you’re right, sorry I went off on a tangent about the reasons for the intense negativity in the Lemmyverse about LLMs. I’ve been using lemmy for four years, and definitely don’t think there has ever been any positive feelings towards LLMs here, especially as ChatGPT’s arrival predates the first surge of users on Lemmy (and the subsequent appearance of all the instances we see today). On reddit, yes, and there are still many people there who still think OpenAI is great.
I don’t think you’ve paid enough attention. Back when ChatGPT first launched, they were treated as saints.
The negative opinions have corresponded with public sentiment souring towards them in general (this did happen quite quickly, however).
They just wants the attention of an argument. I made the mistake of giving it to them.
One example and I shutup
Or you could just shut up.
When you admit you’re lying, sure!
Dude… I’m not digging through years worth of comments across several social media platforms and accounts on each just to satisfy your purposelessly sad need for attention.
So if as a result of this. you are left with no other choice than to accuse me of lying because I’m not playing along with your little internet rule of “you have to prove what you say or I get to call you a liar!” bullshit, then be my guest. But I’m an adult. I don’t play by nonsense childish internet rules and I don’t appease trolls.
Now, having explained my stance on the issue, I can expect you’ll exercise your compulsion to have the last word and call me a liar again?
Don’t care either way.
It took me like a whole minute to do it to you and prove you are lying. Faster than typing up your responses.
You are a liar.
search “ai” posts by you in the search box
sort by upvotes, go to where it’s negative, link one example
easy
it is so incredibly fast, yet you cannot do it
i’ll tell you what, if you link an account where it did happen, I’ll do it for you!
Find a better hobby man. Seriously.
Simply link any account and I’ll do it for you, but you can’t, because you’re lying.
find a better hobby than lying for sympathy online.
Can you provide even one example? AI is my autistic obsession, and I never saw anything like that on lemmy even once.
I was even regularly searching for “AI” using the search feature daily.
I have never once seen this, and I don’t find it believable at all, honestly.
I think it’s another example of “internet bubbles” - people with similar views tend to congregate together and this is particularly true on the internet, when going elsewhere is always just a mouse-click away.
When ChatGPT first launched, Lemmy was still pretty much a ghost town, and it did cause a lot of optimistic excitement e.g. on reddit. Lemmy got a big surge in numbers when reddit did its infamous API changes - enshittification driven by spez’s and other reddit executives’ insatiable lust to exploit the site for more and more money.
Perhaps for this reason, people on Lemmy are more averse to the enshittification trend and generally exploitive nature of large tech companies. I think this is what people on Lemmy object to - tech companies’ concentration of power and profits by ripping off the general public - not so much the concept of LLMs themselves, but the fact they could easily be used to further inequality in society.
The claim was that people on lemmy treated openai as saints when chatgpt first came out, I never saw anything like that and I’ve been here for 5 years. https://lemmy.ml/u/communist
i’ve never seen this on lemmy, other places, sure, but not once on lemmy.
Yes you’re right, sorry I went off on a tangent about the reasons for the intense negativity in the Lemmyverse about LLMs. I’ve been using lemmy for four years, and definitely don’t think there has ever been any positive feelings towards LLMs here, especially as ChatGPT’s arrival predates the first surge of users on Lemmy (and the subsequent appearance of all the instances we see today). On reddit, yes, and there are still many people there who still think OpenAI is great.