It presents a slight problem when the ones they’re bringing in to deal with the shitty politicians are the people who paid them to be shitty in the first place.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      We had 60 for less than one month almost two decades ago. Since then we’ve elected less every year and blamed them more every year.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Curious that, if all they need is 60 Democrats, why they didn’t seize that opportunity to try and deliver everything they’ve promised. Working 24/7 to pass bill after bill. And instead just squandered it…

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Oh yeah they should have asked the house nicely to vote to reform every system in the entire government in less than one month: you clearly do not want anything fixed, why are you being so disingenuous?