• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    When you’re $10,000 over the bracket, you can keep $900 of that money for your stock portfolio and give the rest to the IRS, or you can spend $10,000 and pretend it is a “business expense”. That money you spend turns into someone’s paycheck; that $900 does not.

    The money going to the IRS does, but you’re otherwise absolutely right.

    Which is why stock trading should be banned. It’s main functions by now are propping up companies that keep decreasing quality and increasing prices while diverting money into the dragon hoards of billionaires and hectomillionaires, forever out of reach from the pool of available resources that other people need to live.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The money going to the IRS does,

      The government operates on a deficit. The money going to the IRS is just debt service.

      Stock trading isn’t actually the problem. Shares are ownership, and ownership should be held by the masses.

      The problem is that the ultra-rich owns all that stock, rather than the general public. The solution to that isn’t banning trading. Instead, we impose a wealth tax on all registered securities, payable in shares of those securities. If it is subject to SEC oversight, 1% of it gets transferred to IRS liquidators annually.

      The first $10 million held by a natural person is exempt. The IRS liquidates it by selling off small lots over time, comprising no more than 1% of total traded volume.