• thrawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Kind of a weird question— and I’m not defending whatever the article is alleging— but what’s the point of trying to smear Carter’s memory?

    He’s dead. Nobody praises the bad things he might have done. This feels like an attempt to instill even more tiredness into an already exhausted society— “see? Even the guy everyone likes sucked! Nobody should be thought of as good, you must keep this in mind.”

    This doesn’t help unions. This doesn’t help the left. This doesn’t help anyone. Americans are rightfully haggard and all remaining energy should be spent trying to keep the upcoming administration in chaos to minimize harm or supporting good people. Why waste time trying to diminish the memory of a man who, far as I can tell, has done nothing but good the past 40 years?

    And fuck, haven’t we had enough negativity? Many days I avoid social media entirely because it’s just negativity upon negativity. I genuinely can’t fathom a single positive or useful takeaway from media like this.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why shouldn’t someone that felt betrayed by a politician write about their experience? Why shouldn’t people learn about these perspectives?

      “Can everyone quit being so negative” is an awful take when talking about politics/politicians.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        because it only makes sense in a vacuum, if you compare carter’s time to anyone else’s, it holds up fine if not great.

        it’s bullllllshit