Good thing there’s absolutely no evidence of racism when it comes to hiring people
“1 in 6 Hiring Managers Have Been Told to Stop Hiring White Men”
“48% have been asked to prioritize diversity over qualifications”
I have now shown you evidence of racism when it comes to hiring people. I would appreciate if you would not make such a statement in the future.
Company after company have made statements they will have x% of certain positions filled by people of specific races. You don’t achieve that without taking race into consideration when choosing people to work there.
Dropping DEI makes sense. Just hire the best person for the job, regardless of skin color.
Yeah, during those reviews they are going to get their liquor license renewed. Why? Because those businesses have not abused their liquor licenses and have followed all appropriate laws.
The article sites a law that licenses cannot be issued to those convicted of ‘a crime involving moral turpitude’, but then does not follow up by demonstrating the license is being issued to Trump. It merely claims he would benefit from it being issued to the business. The law quoted does not state it can’t be issued to person x if some other person would benefit who has been convicted of such a rime.
Both candidates suck. Nobody wants to watch them.
The Government’s theory would also criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyist to decades in prison…And the Government’s interpretation would give prosecutors broad discretion to seek a 20-year maximum sentence for acts Congress saw fit to punish with far shorter sentences.
From the decision.
In short, the prosecutor used a non-applicable charge against this individual. The case was remanded back to lower courts to continue.
I heard no end to the complaints while Trump was president about how he was able to do dozens of things and Chevron was a big reason for them; the judiciary simply letting the executive do what they want via creative interpretations of the law.
They just gave themselves a huge amount of extra power…If you want any proof that the court is corrupt, there it is.
Interpreting the law is a power the courts have always had; it’s their core function. It wasn’t until Chevron when the courts willingly gave a portion of this power to the executive. Now they are simply taking it back; a power they always had that the executive abused.
The decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf
courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous; Chevron is overruled.
Before it was common for the executive to put their own creative interpretation on a law, and the courts would just go with it. Now judges actually have to do their jobs and rule on the law, not simply defer to the executive. This is a big win for reducing administrative overreach.
Is this odd? Most cars have had several recalls, and if you have never taken your car in for recall work, you need to go look up what work was (not) done on your VIN and take care of it. Lots of cars are still out there with claymores for airbags, make sure your car isn’t among them.
rather than just being normal and evaluating the law on ‘does it seem normal or moral to ban this’
This is the job of the legislature. To make law based on norms and morals, as well as a dozen other factors.
almost like ConStITuTUiOnALiTy is a dumb fucking way validate the law
The job of the judiciary is to rule based on what the various laws say, which obviously includes the Constitution.
Do you really want the judiciary ignoring the law and legislating from the bench? Remember, your preferred group isn’t the one in the majority.
Even Level 1 charging is pretty notable, means the vast majority of your daily miles still come from charging at home. This should be achievable if you have an outside plug and an outdoor extension cable.
Though, I suspect from your statement even that isn’t possible due to ownership issues.
The reduction of monitoring is worth it. DJI calls home with your location and even provides tools for police to view the location of drones and drone operators in real time.
Also, remember to drink shitloads of water. And be cognisant of when you are approaching heatstroke. Don’t try to push through it, find a cool place to sit and drink another liter of water while you cool off.
Click on page 1; OP linked to page 2 which is chaotic to read first.
Are they going to drop the constant data collection, or is that data collection also considered ‘secure’?
Microsoft admitted that it could have taken steps to prevent two aggressive nation-state cyberattacks from China and Russia
Microsoft spent years ignoring a vulnerability while he proposed fixes to the “security nightmare.” Instead, Microsoft feared it might lose its government contract by warning about the bug and allegedly downplayed the problem, choosing profits over security
Jesus fucking Christ Microsoft.
Edit: OP, the article currently links to page 2, which is a bit odd to read first. Here is page 1.
Some states have. It’s currently an open legal question as firearm parts/accessories generally get included under 2A protections as the right to keep and bear arms is infringed if, say, triggers are illegal. It’s currently working it’s way through the courts to determine the answer to your question and we wont have any definitive answers for years.
Twaz the way it was always going to go. There is very specific wording for what is a machine gun, and a bump stock did not meet it.
Yeah, a friend had their basement cement cut and repaired to fix a sewage line. I can’t imagine how much more expensive that would be if they had to worry about the entire basement floor immolating when cut.
Telling one to stop hiring individuals based on their race isn’t pushing back against racism, it’s just racism.