You mean more so than actual NATO troops on the ground, direct feeds and targeting data from drones, missiles and naval drones that require approval to be armed and fired?
You mean more so than actual NATO troops on the ground, direct feeds and targeting data from drones, missiles and naval drones that require approval to be armed and fired?
This goes to show that the idea many people here have - namely that the nazi brigades will be angry and disillusioned with the west and terrorise Europe later down the line - is incorrect. They’re doing exactly what the original nazis had done - send people from other nations and volksturm to die, while SS and generals negotiate deals and get cozy homes out in Americas
That’s… Basically my point?
cult of Manifest Destiny, Amerika über alles, and the blonde-haired blue-eyed capitalist Jesus and his pasty chosen people
Which is all just superstructure to capitalist basis
Okay, but what does that mean? Was the implication that China was somehow using exports to physically attack USA? Or that it would be detrimental to USian markets and companies? If the latter - then “national security” is just economic motivation
As opposed to what? Spiritually motivated? Of course it is “economically motivated” . And politics follow the economy
No one is above USA law is what they want to say
Are we? Look at this Hollywood nonsense:
The cause of the crash was not a direct result of an enemy missile strike, the Ukrainian military claims.
It said the pilot destroyed three cruise missiles and one drone in Russia’s largest aerial attack to date.
“Oleksiy saved Ukrainians from deadly Russian missiles,” the Ukrainian Air Force wrote in a statement on social media. “Unfortunately, at the cost of his own life.”
That’s textbook heroisation. “Our brave patriot boi shot down ebil enemies and SAAAAVED lives then tragically perished while Aerosmith is playing in the background”
Why not? Jets are commonly shot down with missiles. It’s rather hard to kill them spraying them with machine-gun fire. You can do it of course but a missile is the more reliable solution which is why jets made for dog-fights usually carry multiples.
Because Iskander is not an air-to-air (which jets carry) or even ground-to-air (like the aforementioned patriot). It’s a ballistic missile. Ground to ground. Very different targeting systems and the rocket itself
Interesting, does that mean USA has a powerful enough farming industry / agriculture to support other countries?
Just like everything else
was destroyed by an Iskander strike
On the ground? Because I can’t imagine a jet getting smacked out of the sky by a ballistic missile
Eh, screw the church anyway
they might finally learn something about military terror campaigns
They learned they can get away with them
Russia is serious about denazification, not by bombs but, like, in general
Given how much Russian government officials are bleating about “traditional values”? I wouldn’t hold my breath
“white(ish), Christian” identity’s aspirations
Judging by some of the publications from the Russian government, they aim to grab a share of that market as well
Rubbish, it was never dominant to begin with