Yeah, I can understand the emotions behind, “well, if the civilian population doesn’t rise up and engage in open warfare against their own militarized police and actual combat military forces that protect a government that is doing bad things so its okay to kill all the civilians,” but the though is a really really shitty thing to think or advocate for.
Pretty sure the theory heads could quote somebody from the past about the ineffectual nature of “revolutionary terrorism”.
When you attack civilians, it doesn’t stop the military from doing military stuff.
When you attack civilians it gives the military more justification to keep doing horrible things.
When you attack civilians it gives the politicians more justification to let the military to keep doing horrible things.
abandoned equipment
So… any time a vehicle is left in place for the mobile mechanic convoy to pick up… if a Ukrainian sees it, it counts as a battlefield loss right up until the moment that its picked up by the mechanics pick it up.
deleted by creator
Beating transphobia, one punch at a time.
Hope it sticks this time.
Cracking a nuke plant isn’t a good thing. Shooting close enough to get Israel it waste resources defending it might be, though its going make them seem weak.
So what funny thing is going to happen to make me rethink my atheism?
I like that the acronym is ATACMS and when I say it, it sounds like “Attack 'ems”. Very on point.
Mostly because I’m not the most competent techie, I’ve been using VLC between my PC and iPhone, for moving “books” around on devices that are very out of date.
make a backup
Pffftt… coward.
/s
Sure thing General (wink wink), when Osama bin Laden did a terror attack on the USA in 2001 the response was absolutely to think critically about the USA’s imperialist ways and absolutely not a global tantrum that has murdered and displaced many millions of people all over the world.