Nah, they got bought by Securitas.
Nah, they got bought by Securitas.
Here’s a hint: stop editorializing when you’re JAQing it. Makes it a little obvious.
Does “condemned” mean “expelled” or “told not to get caught” in British?
Removed by mod
If he hadn’t assaulted her he might have been able to make her pay his dry cleaning bill.
You can stop pretending to be a JAQing off American, btw. You outed yourself to all the native speakers.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Just ask my slaves. Gods, I love slavery. - Plato
I’ll take the red fascist mobo for use in the Second American Civil War, np
He won’t. The assault is on tape and clearly not justified by self defense. The woman’s nose was even broken, so he can’t argue no true harm was caused.
Him. Provocation is usually a mitigating factor, but not a complete defense, and it’s not like she just randomly threw a drink at him, there was an argument leading to it.
Even when it would be a defense it certainly wouldn’t excuse him in this circumstance.
One less Trump vote.
Other way around! That’s why there are dragons in the Völsunga Saga and Beowulf. This is historical fact I’m pretty sure.
Democrats aren’t even successful as a controlling party.
It’s the correct spelling in draconic
Yes, indeed. So really what you need from a president is a trustworthy image and a baseline moral character, because all the actual governance minutiae is handled by the staff.
So why is it that all these people come out of the woodwork to insist the president NEEDS to be mired in one of the most corrupt political systems in the developed world?
Yes, yes, we all know what happens when you scratch a liberal but it’s better than not having to scratch to find it. Even if all that’s holding the powers that be back is a skin-deep veneer of civility and deniability a vote to strip that veneer away makes you a fool, not a revolutionary.
Strange that an ailing old man has his administration behind him to do all the gruntwork but an actually popular candidate wouldn’t
“Nice dick, bro”