JackbyDev

Didn’t he have a stutter when younger?

every accusation is a confession.

This is all I could think of when Trump said Democrats would use every avenue both legal and illegal to overturn election results.

More like there being chemicals that actually fucked up frogs’ genitals but we only ever heard about it through the lens of Alex Jones and “turning the freaking frogs gay [sic]” https://youtu.be/i5uSbp0YDhc

They say they already use it to manage GitHub issues so it’s definitely more than “point 0” right now.

That’s always struck me as odd, but I’m also very much an outsider looking in. A “gecko electron” does sound intriguing though.

The red numbers show it chronologically. Twitter has replies and quote retweets. This began with the purple quote retweet. To which Lake Superior responded. Then in green I think this is a quote retweet (or more likely a screenshot) of the exchange. (I don’t think you can quote multiple posts so I think it’s a screenshot.)

I see ads pretty much everyday in Windows. They’re not as attention grabbing as traditional ads and I think this is part of why some people don’t see them.

🙄

Just because it might be legal to violate copyrights in other countries doesn’t make the code considered open source though lol.

You’re being obtuse. I get the point you’re trying to make – you’ve been heard. I’m just saying those aren’t the terms you should be using to make it. Open source has a very distinct definition and it has to do with the licenses covering the code. It has nothing to do with whether different countries have differing laws. Code cannot be open source in one country and not open source in another because the definition has nothing to do with countries. In fact, that would specifically not be open source because it gives rights to some and not others.

If someone infringes on a copyright that doesn’t mean the work isn’t copyrighted. You can’t just say things that are source available are open source. Even if someone is infringing on the rights holders they’re still only source available.

Open source doesn’t mean source available. You simply aren’t using the term correctly.

Please don’t muddy the water with terms like this. Something is open source if and only if it has an open source license.

Don’t forget that “open source” has a different definition than “source available”.

while nearly no one is complaining about MS using github to train their copilot LLM,

Lots of people complained about that. I’ve only seen this single thread complaining about this.

I know. Just the “full-stack meta frameworks” part alone makes any ADHD person feel nausea.

??? Please don’t make weird blanket statements like this.

1 hundred times!

Ahhh, I didn’t see it before.

Space debris hitting a house is newsworthy in and of itself. It’s rare and fascinating.

The fact that you even thought frivolous lawsuit when reading the headline is a sign that McDonald’s campaign to vilifying suing worked.