The social situation in which the other naked little boys ostracize the one with a different dick is patriarchal. Must conform to the “normal” masculine standard. Otherwise the fathers could just teach all the little boys to be more accepting.

As for women, I’ve been in plenty of women -only places where there was frank talk about men’s anatomy, and the general consensus has always been, we can love any and all penises as long as the owner isn’t a dick.

Fathers wanting their boy to look “like all the other little boys” is aesthetics

Might be preferable to being stuck down this stupid leg of the Trousers of Time

I’ve never been overfond of it myself, but I like it better with some cheese or meat in the sauce.

❤️🫀

That’s a hip, not a belly. I think.

Why not both? Put up posters of him with all/each of the allegations, and stamp CONVICTED across each of those. Since the immigrant ones don’t have the stamp, just like some of the Trump ones, the distinction is made.

How do you feel about being read to? Your spouse might enjoy being the reader. I haven’t read to mine but I loved reading aloud to our kids, especially The Wee Free Men, even though I was apparently wrong in pronouncing “Crivens!” with a long I. Pratchett books in general are great for doing the voices, because they live on the Disc, so technically you’re never butchering the accents even if your version of sounding out those vowels and consonants and apostrophes are like nothing on Earth.

“walk at one, talk at two” indicates that “toddler” is correct

Run? He won’t need to run, he’ll be Führer by then.

Any mistake by any woman “justifies” the canard that women are incompetent. Same is used for Black men, but judging by the election record, the misogyny is even deeper than the racism.

I’ve heard of butterfly kisses, done by one person to the other person’s cheek or neck, it tickles. Reciprocal ones, lash to lash, is new to me.

SHUDDER

I’ve never heard a woman say they did or would have their baby boy circumcised because uncircumcised penises are gross, or any other version of aesthetic reasons. The religious reasons are rooted in the patriarchy, as is the “need” to look like one’s father and male relatives.

In the case of female circumcision, it’s a way of enforcing the position of women as property, making it more apparent if she’s ever had sex so her virginity can be sold to her husband. In its most extreme forms it can require she be cut open in order to give birth, and resewn each time. It can block clumps of menstrual blood and lead to infection and sepsis. In less extreme versions it can prevent her from feeling any pleasure during sex, in order to prevent her from having any except that imposed by her husband.

The only reason a scalpel should be anywhere near a person’s genitals is to treat a serious health issue. Which includes dysphoria.

How about we just stop insulting anyone’s genitals instead?

I feel like your argument loses something by being stated backwards. It (and Hacksaws reply) comes off sounding like you are more angry at women than the patriarchy and want to be able to mutilate and body shame them. Rather than what I hope and assume is the case, that you want all genitals protected from mutilation and shaming.

It’s chaotic evil, but on the whole I prefer the backpedaling to any of his forward progress. Considering where the road leads.

If you have all the lights on, that one little light won’t bother you as much because your pupils aren’t dilated.

In true Easter Egg Hunt fashion, one egg was not recovered until someone’s grandchild randomly found it a day later.