I guess that makes your comment woke.

But… it does have crumple zones.

The entire front and rear castings are designed to shatter in a high energy collision and crumple.

The size of a crumple zone isn’t as important as how it absorbs the energy and dispenses it.

You could have a 20foot crumple zone that’s empty and it’s be useless.

You can see it crumpled here. They’ve also posted a different video on the official X account of a crash test but I won’t post that to avoid linking them. here.

Since you got something so utterly basic wrong and posted it as true, I can only assume the entire post is fabricated.

Edit: took a screen shot instead of video. It crumples all the way past the front wheels

I was kinda hoping it’d always stay like this.

That’s what you need distress codes for.

Destruction of evidence is a much different crime.

I would suspect it’d no longer be legal to hold them indefinitely and instead at best get the max prison sentence for that crime instead.

A us law website says that’s no more than 20y as the absolute max, and getting max would probably be hard if they don’t have anything else on you.

You’d have to weigh that against what’s on the device.

Also, even better if the distress code nukes the bad content, and then has a real 2nd profile that looks real, which makes it even harder to prove you used a distress code.

I’m not sure how much it would actually help for a regular thief.

This is about protecting it against more sophisticated attacks. But the rest probably have those means if wanted.

Right, but this is about them bypassing you entirely.

They don’t need your fingerprint or pass code if they can bypass it themselves. This feature protects you when they’ve seized it lawfully which can be for many reasons.

That’s all lawful.

They can search you and the area when arrested. They can search the car if they have probable cause that evidence will be in the vehicle

I said have a warrant or seized lawfully, not nust have a warrant.

Edit: I didn’t even write what I said I said correctly. Corrected it lol.

They usually do have a warrant or it was seized lawfully.

This is about keeping them out even when it’s lawful.

It’s not the same.

On an iPhone it’ll reboot after X hours of no use. That means it could go months without rebooting and the day after it’s in police hands it reboots.

The feature you’re talking about would need to be set to reboot every day at a specific time. Now you personally have to deal with that. Also until you unlock the phone as well there could be reduced functionality making it annoying.

Very different.

They can only send what’s been allocated, and maybe a little wiggle room on certain things, but otherwise congress would need to approve it. They’re already trying to make sure they use up the last of what was allocated before the end of the year.

I like in the article how it says they’ll get some time to reformulate, but if it doesn’t work, they could just turn off the widget inserting it and bobs your uncle!

Supposedly he couldn’t give the resources to anyone else as they were gathered for a biden/Harris campaign.

Since Harris was part of that there was no problems with her taking it over

Probably some kind of fraud otherwise. Collecting funds for a different purpose.

The way things are going they’ll eventually ban unnecessary procedures that prevent fertility as well unless you’re married and already had multiple kids.

Your suffering will be the point.

Don’t even visit while pregnant.

Things can happen suddenly and you might not be able to get out to save your life.

Bonus points if there’s a pet in the picture and you say they ate it that night.

Wow dude, you need to chill out.

I’m just going to keep posting this to every future reply you make.

Note my edit to your “akin to” comment.

Respectfully, I don’t know where you are pulling that equivalence from? I don’t believe I said 1 in 5 would likely die from losing a pregnancy?

Ummm dude

Texas killing this child for losing a pregnancy is (very similar to) them having you roll a 5 sided dice and shooting anyone who lands on a “4” between the eyes.

You totally did, and this is what triggered my response.

I love how post something very wrong, challenge it twice and ask if i even know what some words mean, which you clearly didnt, and then wave off how wrong you are and tell me to shut up.

I even said the sentiment is there.

What a jerk, you must be fun at parties

Texas killing this child for losing a pregnancy is akin to them having you roll a 5 sided dice and shooting anyone who lands on a “4” between the eyes.

Akin to

very similar to something

Texas killing this child for losing a pregnancy is very similar to having you roll a 5 sided dice and shooting anyone who lands on a “4” between the eyes.

Your equating the 1 in 5 miscarriages to having a 1 in 5 chance of death but 1 in 5 miscarriages do not have a chance of death very similar to being shot if you roll a 4 on a 5 sided dice which is a 1 in 5 chance of death.

Edit: Just cleaning this up as what I wrote got confusing…

Your saying that 1 in 5 pregencies have a miscarriage (20%) and equate a miscarriage that happens 1/5 times, to being shot 1/5 times which would be death. But an (edit untreated) miscarriage doesn’t mean death. So it is not very similar to having a 1/5 chance of death by being shot.

Maybe you don’t know what you wrote?

Respectfully, I don’t know where you are pulling that equivalence from? I don’t believe I said 1 in 5 would likely die from losing a pregnancy?

Ummm dude

Texas killing this child for losing a pregnancy is akin to them having you roll a 5 sided dice and shooting anyone who lands on a “4” between the eyes.

You totally did, and this is what triggered my response.

The sentiment is there, but 1 in 5 ending in miscarriage is not 1 in 5 that would be deadly if a miscarriage happened.

Also, that number is known miscarriages (and is the high end i believe of the range). Even more happen before the mother even knows they are pregnant.

Part of the reason you don’t tell people before the first trimester is over is because miscarriages before are common.