I rudely agree with your opinion

Have you checked if there is any record of your Bluetooth card on the Linux hardware database?
That might give you an indication of how well it’s supported

Never done anything with 2 mics, so I’ll just throw a vague suggestion: there’s Helvum to combine the mic inputs and then Easy Effects that can apply a few noise suppression filters that can do world of a difference, maybe the first isn’t even necessary, while the second is the core and can be tweaked a lot

cat propaganda

Yep, a never ending cycle!
Boomer just has such a nice ring to it, can’t wait to be called that, already got called old for not being in on the latest memes so it’s only a matter of time

Damn, TikTok has been here for at least 5 years now?? Those old-feeling people were right, I do feel old

Let the Zucc feel the heat

C supremacy

I’m guessing you’re currently on Windows, right? If so, Virtualbox is perfectly fine, otherwise, if you’re on Linux already, you could use Boxes or Virt manager that are more performant, but don’t stress yourself if you just wanna play around Virtualbox will always be more than sufficient.
As for the ISOs you can just get them directly from the distro websites or, if using Boxes, you can choose one at VM creation and it’ll download it for you

Damn these programmers horny af

Oh I get it now, for me that’s not a problem since I’m also in the EU, but I can see why it’s an issue, I do have a VPN too, but barely use it

DisplayPort connector stuck in socket I think

I see.

tor has geo location issues.

Could you explain what you mean with this? I’m not sure I understand

mullvad for looking shit up on ecommerce sites with new ID each time

Is it sufficient? I’d always assumed it was easily targetable with the IP so I started using TOR for that purpose

That’s fair, I won’t say that it’s not as complicated as it sounds because I don’t know what you know, but if you want it put into simple words, it’s the following:

1. Install drive 1 in PC
2. Install Windows
3. Remove drive 1 from the PC and put drive 2 in its place
4. Install any Linux distro that comes with GRUB as bootloader (most of them, personally recommend Fedora if you want a suggestion)
5. Install drive 1 into the second slot that was left empty up to now
6. Start boot, your motherboard will have a specific key to launch the boot selector, e.g. F10, or go into the UEFI settings to put the Linux option first
7. Boot into Linux and trigger the GRUB detection for other OSes so it updates the list of entries
8. Reboot
9. Now without having to smash a random key to get the built-in boot selector, you will instead be able to choose comfortably from GRUB.

Anyways don’t pressure yourself into doing any of that if you don’t feel comfortable with it, of course.
One step at a time, the important thing is you’re satisfied with what you have and that it’s functional to your workflow

Why use git exactly? You’re never changing the content of the files themselves (excluding the effect of lossy compression) so you also don’t need to track those changes, right?
This seems more like a job for rsync.

Aside from that, I don’t know more for how to achieve the full setup you’re trying to create, sorry

You just need to run the installation with one drive at a time if you want to be extra sure, then each will have its own boot partition and they can still work together, for example I have 3 drives, one Linux, one Windows and one storage, the Linux one has GRUB on it and it detects the bootloader on the Windows drive just fine so you can select either from that or the UEFI boot selector. Never had updates scramble anything for neither of the two systems

The tool presents a significant privacy risk, and shows that people may not be as anonymous in the YouTube comments sections as they may think.

I don’t understand how this makes the privacy on YouTube any worse when all the information it sources from is already public, this is just automated doxxing, which, while we’ll agree to be unethical, was never a privacy violation, it is just the consequence of the actions of who posted the information to begin with.
Also does it really violate YouTube’s privacy policy? It’s new to me that service consumers can be subject to the policy when it’s not the third parties that YouTube actively sends the information to, that sounds more to me like Terms of service, which are hardly enforceable fully (thank goodness, so we can have our yt-dlp and PipePipe)

The duality binary of man

There is Interstellar!