ihatebirds

if you can’t handle political content then just excluding worldnews from your feed should be enough

u single?

It’s completely normal father-son bonding. Find a different slant.

deleted by creator

that’s when I go get tested for covid

it was that time Biden walked into a Subway and said “you’re telling me a tuna melted this sandwhich?” and everyone laughed

just like that one movie, what’s it called

he can fix her

when in Rome

I need an adult?

can’t even buy eggs anymore because of woke

“we gotta get more racist”

✋ DEI hire

👉 DUI hire

deleted by creator

the article you’re talking about reads like a case of “our holy narrative-correcting taskforce vs their pagan misinformation agents”

[bad actors] put in the effort to build reputation…, mixing legitimate page edits with the more politically sensitive ones

through subtle changes like casting doubt on the objectivity of pro-Western accounts

they also mention adding links from Russian state-owned news, but the article doesn’t indicate that those things happen in the same incidents though mentioning it in the same sentence is certainly an attempt to conflate them. It’s one thing to remove insufficiently reliable sources, correcting misrepresented facts, and banning the wreckers that consistently produce it, but I think there is an issue if validly-sourced edits are being censored by “bias adjusters” (NPOV purposes withstanding) just because the content is deemed to have been written by a suspected bad actor.

everybody click your wrongthink ⬇️ button, quick!

deleted by creator