So, I haven’t heard much about JP in a while,and now I’ve heard a podcast and this. Is it just coincidence or is there a reason we’re talking about him again? The podcast mentioned he’d gone on some show debating Christianity with 20 atheists. It went as you might imagine, where jp argued that atheists were Christian because they didn’t understand the thing they say they don’t believe in. Idk. Anyway – any other reason I’m hearing about him again?

Can I get an updated signal invite?

I’d say that’s a win. Gyno appts are important!

No, I wasn’t sure if you were distinguishing between Nuremberg or the slave owners. You write “their” but there are two possible groups that could be applied to, and possibly both. Your message changes based on how I read “their”, so just seeking clarification on what you’re trying to say.

Lmao. This one is great, but they never show up in my feed. I can tell I found it 3 months ago, because I’ve liked a bunch of posts three months ago. Anyway, tons of gold since then!

This is a great reminder to clean my computer fans.

Does owning my own hardware prevent the service provider from getting this data?

Whose crimes were downplayed?

I read ‘humiliation’ camps at first.

Surely we have one gyno on Lemmy to chime in with a charming story we will be referencing for months?

The googly eye is the only important part.

Have y’all seen the clip where a reporter at alligator aushwitz asks him how long detainees will be held there, and he doesn’t understand the question, gets it repeated, and then still doesn’t understand so starts rambling about how much he loves Florida and will be there as long as he can. He also takes the opportunity to say the oval office wasn’t well cared for, but he’s cleaned up and made it a “beautiful diamond”.

https://xcancel.com/atrupar/status/1940092922822594880#m

Lol, ty for the back story

This is like when you’re going crazy in don’t starve.

That does nothing to help anyone hurt by the actions.

I’m pretty sure the hypocrisy is exactly what is incensing about this photo.

I would prefer that as a community, we acknowledge the existence of this bias in healthcare data, and also acknowledge how harmful that bias is while using adequate resources to remedy the known issues.

There is a more specific word for it: Institutional racism.

Institutional racism, also known as systemic racism, is a form of institutional discrimination based on race or ethnic group and can include policies and practices that exist throughout a whole society or organization that result in and support a continued unfair advantage to some people and unfair or harmful treatment of others. It manifests as discrimination in areas such as criminal justice, employment, housing, healthcare, education and political representation.[1]

There is a more specific word for it: Institutional racism.

Institutional racism, also known as systemic racism, is a form of institutional discrimination based on race or ethnic group and can include policies and practices that exist throughout a whole society or organization that result in and support a continued unfair advantage to some people and unfair or harmful treatment of others. It manifests as discrimination in areas such as criminal justice, employment, housing, healthcare, education and political representation.[1]

There is a more specific word for it: Institutional racism.

Institutional racism, also known as systemic racism, is a form of institutional discrimination based on race or ethnic group and can include policies and practices that exist throughout a whole society or organization that result in and support a continued unfair advantage to some people and unfair or harmful treatment of others. It manifests as discrimination in areas such as criminal justice, employment, housing, healthcare, education and political representation.[1]

Why is there a lack of robust training data across skin colors? Could it be that people with darker skin colors have less access to cutting edge medical care and research studies? Would be pretty racist.

There is a similar bias in medical literature for genders. Many studies only consider males. That is sexist.