• simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 days ago

    Mickey 17 was well advertised imo with big names attached. Still bombed.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m still confused by what happened with this film. I knew it was coming out, but I didn’t get around to seeing it opening weekend, then by Wednesday of the next week the headlines stated that it was leaving theaters and heading to streaming.

      I would have seen it in theaters, but once the streaming was announced I didn’t mind waiting another week or two.

      I just saw it and enjoyed it.

      I feel like it didn’t have any time to build momentum, just kicked almost straight to streaming.

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The problem is the short time windows in theaters and yeah it was a good movie. The fact it was a trump analog hurt it and Paterson is a great actor fuck twilight but the Batman was a great movie and the penguin is a masterpiece of television.

        Black bag didn’t get any advertising. The problem is studios have trained their audience to expect slop then they put out a few good original movies for a short time window then point at it and say see audiences don’t want original films.

        – guy that watches original movies every weekend in the theater

        Also studios don’t want original movies they want shit that they can make toys for or tie-ins with McDonald’s. They also don’t want directors with their own vision messing up their synergy with their marketing partners. They want people to put out content not art.

      • triptrapper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I had the same thought. How were they calling it a bomb after like 5 days? Keep it in theaters long enough for word-of-mouth to spread and things would be different.

    • xyzzy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      I liked the movie, but it had no chance. The budget was way too big. It should never have been given such a big budget.

      I want more mid-budget original movies that actually have a chance of financial success.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Things are kinda invisible if they don’t trend on social media. Hence, meaning no offense to OP, they have not show up in OP’s feeds.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is a shame too, because it was for all intents and purposes a good movie. And I say that as someone who did not like Pattinson as an actor (thanks Twilight).

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I didn’t hear about that one almost at all and I go to the theater every week.

      I only knew about it because I like the director and go out of my way to look up interesting movies.