Trump has suggested that “homegrown” criminals who have been convicted of certain crimes should be deported, but the idea raises significant legal questions.

If an immigrant who the government claims is a gang member can be deported to El Salvador without any due process rights, then why not a U.S. citizen?

That was the nightmarish scenario immigration advocates and constitutional law experts were considering on Monday after Donald Trump again pushed a provocative plan to deport U.S. citizens who have been convicted of unspecified crimes.

Trump discussed the issue in the White House with El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, who has agreed to deposit people deported from the U.S. into a notorious prison.

  • boydster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    You cannot “deport” U.S. citizens to El Salvador or any other country. You can, however, kidnap and exile them. Let’s respect language, oh great media overlords.

    • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      They shouldn’t have been using the word “deport” in the first place for sending people to prison. “Deport” implies sending back to their own country, not imprisoning them

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    He also thinks it’s a crime to disagree with him. There will be lots of people being deported shortly before midterms.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Ah, but Democrats will fight back by (1) pointing out that it’s against the rules, (2) waiting for him to acknowledge his error and apologize, and (3) voting for their own imprisonment.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    He’s done a lot of obviously illegal things. One might even say he’s become accustomed to not being held accountable for doing illegal things.

  • Kagu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Its really depressing that all the “resistance” we can offer is to pout and go “BUT THATS ILLEGAL” while our supposed opposition party votes to confirm every nominee and pass every barbaric bill by this admin…

  • Snowstorm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    What’s the next chapter in this story? Some hackers leak the personal info of all ICE grunts and they gets involved in all kind of accidents? In the last century, in Germany, moderates got declared undesirable anyway so now that they have a chance to organize beforehand. Some states ban ICE altogether and becomes safe havens? It’s easy being mesmerized and keep on with “but that’s illegal” , do something else happen? A few millions angry Americans can’t all fit in a 40000 person prison.

  • Flemmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Trump is a relic of a system that already died in 1-1-2000. 9-11 was a final attempt to enforce the 20th century Rockefeller economy. The system has collapsed. We had 25 years to adapt. Oh right and this article is about another loop in the law attempt.

  • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Nuh-uh, you can’t do that, it’s against the rules”

    Rules don’t mean a thing, kid. The bigger kid makes the rules as long as there are no adults in the room