There’s another comment in this thread that points out how slippery a slope it becomes when you try to apply breeds to humans, but that is kind of the idea isn’t it? You seem to accept it in the case of dogs. Either way, I don’t really have a hard stance either way, was just more curious of your reasoning.
You assumed I accepted it at dogs just because I pointed out the irony of all cats just being of the house variety. To me dogs are dogs guess what wolfs are dogs too. You dirty ape. :)
I mean, nobody’s saying dogs are different races, there’s just dogs with different phenotypic traits. When they match a certain known pattern that’s a “breed”.
It’s about as real as beer recipes matching certain styles. Race isn’t a real thing, it’s just sets of traits that people are used to seeing in certain populations.
So we should make bald men a separate breed of human, and NFL lineman another?
There’s another comment in this thread that points out how slippery a slope it becomes when you try to apply breeds to humans, but that is kind of the idea isn’t it? You seem to accept it in the case of dogs. Either way, I don’t really have a hard stance either way, was just more curious of your reasoning.
You assumed I accepted it at dogs just because I pointed out the irony of all cats just being of the house variety. To me dogs are dogs guess what wolfs are dogs too. You dirty ape. :)
I mean, nobody’s saying dogs are different races, there’s just dogs with different phenotypic traits. When they match a certain known pattern that’s a “breed”.
It’s about as real as beer recipes matching certain styles. Race isn’t a real thing, it’s just sets of traits that people are used to seeing in certain populations.