None. They’re all stamped from thin sheet metal. Tines and handles are too thin and will bend.
3 > 1 & 4 >> 5 >>>>>>> 2
1 is the one you leave in the drawer till it’s the last one or use for stuff you don’t want to risk your other forks for…
2
…get that f*ucking plural-comma out of my face…
1 head + 5 handle
Definitely 2. All other answers are just plain wrong.
3
None of them are great, all too thin and probably have hard 90° edges from being stamped cheap metal, but maybe 2. Five can fuck off, too wide and trying to be a spoon, the rest are too narrow in the handle.
- 1 is also nice, every other choice is heresy.
Head of 2, body of 5.
This is the correct answer
Yeah, the actual fork bit of 2 is nice but I don’t like utensils with dump truck ass; they’re top heavy when in use.
I agree, but if we could include the prong to base ratio of 4, that’d be great. I feel like 2’s head is to… idk, flimsy? Either the base should extend further or the prongs be shorter. Great shape otherwise though…
4 looks too spork like. No thanks
Nah just two all round
It’s a trick question, they’re all bad.
(I have autism)
Neurodivergents*
Neuro Diver Gents*
2, 5 if there are no clean 2s
Strange, my first thought was “except 2 and 5 all are valid”
There isn’t a best, maybe a less bad but even then it’s an impossible choice. ✋wins here.
I want to say 2 because longest fork depth, but 4 has that round mouth feel with still good fork depth without being too aggressive about the curvature like 5. The thicker outer prongs grip slippery/heavy food better too.
I’m going 4.
Also because 2 has that annoying fin. The worst forks do that, and also curve down. Hurts my hands, but I’m a giant with bear paws so YMMV.
