He also allegedly had the manifesto with him, which makes no sense. Basically they just said “We randomly got a tip for this guy at mc donalds and he happened to have all possible pieces of evidence on him days after making a clean get away” mmm yeeah sure…
And ‘oh, by the way’, we botched the arrest and search and there are some real questions about chain of custody, the search itself, and the evidence. Then there’s the ease (edit: ‘eaves’) dropping on his privileged communication with his attorney… clown show over here.
And it would’ve been so much easier to plant the stuff at his house while he was being taken. Except that would have required a small amount of thinking.
He also allegedly had the manifesto with him, which makes no sense. Basically they just said “We randomly got a tip for this guy at mc donalds and he happened to have all possible pieces of evidence on him days after making a clean get away” mmm yeeah sure…
And ‘oh, by the way’, we botched the arrest and search and there are some real questions about chain of custody, the search itself, and the evidence. Then there’s the
ease(edit: ‘eaves’) dropping on his privileged communication with his attorney… clown show over here.Btw, it’s “Eavesdropping”.
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Eavesdropping
I ain’t been droppin no eaves sir, honest. I was just cutting the grass under the window there if you’ll follow me
My pragmatic theory:
Oof I hate that that is plausible as fuck
Here’s another thought. Some of the cops also support the action and intentionally botch evidence custody.
And it would’ve been so much easier to plant the stuff at his house while he was being taken. Except that would have required a small amount of thinking.