• orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Confidentiality agreements do not cover illegal acts. Since you brought up the bar association, fun fact about that is that if you admit to say abusing a child to your lawyer not only is that not covered by attorney-client privilege the lawyer is obligated to inform law enforcement or face punishment by the bar association for failing to do so.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No.

      If I tell my lawyer about a child I abused years ago he can do exactly nothing as there is no imminent crime to prevent that would allow him breaking confidality.

      If I tell my priest the same applies.

      If you want to change that, change the laws binding those people. But don’t pretend that the church is going out of its way to protect child abuse by in reality doing nothing and applying the same rule indiscriminately exactly like they did for a millenium.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Small correction, a lawyer is only obligated if they believe there is a specific ongoing risk. It’s the difference between saying you committed a crime in the past and saying that you are going to commit one in future.