"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1408arrow-down117
arrow-up1391arrow-down1external-linkWere you aware?lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·1 day agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·1 day ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 day agoi get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoSounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
At least one person gets the joke
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip