Summary

Female veterans and service members are condemning Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth’s comments opposing women in combat roles, calling them outdated and harmful.

Hegseth claimed women in combat complicate military effectiveness, despite decades of evidence proving their competence, including service in Iraq and Afghanistan, where over 300,000 women served, with 179 killed and over 1,000 wounded.

Critics, including Sen. Tammy Duckworth, a Purple Heart recipient, argue Hegseth’s views ignore the realities of modern warfare.

His nomination has sparked backlash, further amplified by past allegations of sexual misconduct.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sorry, ladies, but you were outvoted by the conservatives by a large margin. You could try confronting them, but it’s far too late now.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That and the fact that he thought it was a good idea to throw an ax at a small target that had people behind. And his white supremacist tattoo. And the dude does not wash his hands after he shits. It’d be a shame if he and RFK Jr got cholera and/or hep C.

  • eatthecake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Most people agree with him and nothing will ever change their minds. We are not living in a world of evidence based beliefs.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If Americans wanted Women to have Rights and Respect they WOULDNT have Voted for a Convicted Rapist!

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump is throwing out rapid fire unqualified pics to force votes against him in the Senate. This isn’t usual politics. He’s just throwing grenades because he can.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I feel this argument has merit:

      That Trump is rewarding loyalty with little consequence to himself and at the same time testing senators to see who will fall in line. That also has the effect of making many fall in line (see Dictatoring for Dummies, P. 14). At the same time he gets to soften up the senate for candidates who are almost as outrageous but will seem reasonable in comparison.

    • Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Do we really expect votes against him? They’re always bemoaning how bad he is, followed with falling in line to vote as dictated to them.

    • Catma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I saw some bonkers rumor about Trump adjourning cogress allowing him to make recess appointments.

      So he throws out shit nominees to force the Senate to not approve someone, looking at you RFK, Trump says he cant work with this Senate and adjourns them. Makes even worse appointmemts and bingo bango we have an american despot.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is my theory too. I don’t think people understand how much the Republicans controlling Trump have been planning for this.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          He isn’t playing chess because he’s not the one doing the chess playing. He’s a puppet. Do you think he came up with any of Project 2025?

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s exactly what this is. It’s easier to loot the country when everything is burning and your corruption isn’t the biggest problem.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You know what? I’m starting to think that a nazi might not be a good pick for Defense Secretary if he can’t respect women.