Justice Clarence Thomas argued that OSHA's authority was unconstitutional. He dissented from the court's decision to reject a challenge to the agency.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has set his sights on eliminating the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday announced which cases it would consider next and which it wouldn’t. Among those the court rejected was a case that challenged the authority of OSHA, which sets and enforces standards for health and safety in the workplace.

And Thomas, widely considered to be the most conservative justice on the already mostly conservative court, wasn’t happy.

In a dissent, he explained why he believed the high court should’ve taken the case: OSHA’s power, he argues, is unconstitutional.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    231·
    3 days ago

    Killing chevron was the biggest step already. Now corpos just have to chip away with lawsuits.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.clubEnglish
      1·
      3 days ago

      I understand that. I’m just wondering if you can push these rulemaking bodies to the legislative branch and what it would look like.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        2·
        3 days ago

        Oh the bodies themselves. Uhh, I think congress could hypothetically empower them because it’s their laws being interpreted, but Republicans won’t go for it.