• Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Don’t think so. Nothing in history proves we can. This era seems to be on the way out so we we’ll have some sort of collapse.

    • kazaika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      57 minutes ago

      Nothing in history proves we can

      Bruh, now you’re just talking nonsense. History proves shit about the future, and its kinda sad that you cant name a single great thing in history

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We’re still here. Through each of the roughest times in history, humans have pulled through. We’ll keep pulling through, of that much I’m certain. Will it be in the same form? Eeeeeeeeeeh

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have no idea if we will, but I want to give it the best god damn chance we can get.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, yes. Humanity as a whole will probably stop sucking ass before it gets wiped out completely. Though it might cost us a few billion. Lives, I mean, not dollars.

    • Alienmonkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Surfing entropy.

      Ride the stardust wave into an agricultural mountain dew future. It’s what plants love.

        • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          52 minutes ago

          Of course it is. Humans have always been extremely greedy and selfish.

          Things would be much worse if we didn’t have regulations to control human behavior, and in the US we’re about to experience what happens when those regulations disappear.

          • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 minutes ago

            No, they haven’t always been extremely greedy and selfish. All social animals strike a balance between self-interest and group-interest, and humans are no different.

            Some humans have always been extremely greedy and selfish. And some of those humans have always been charismatic and persuasive. And many other humans are not equipped to differentiate between emotionally persuasive and right. Well-intentioned humans will often connect themselves to the wrong people or ideas.

            That’s not really their fault. We’re repurposing evolution’s creations for things they weren’t built to do. We’re trying to build empathy and connection with people that are chronologically, geographically, and/or psychologically distant from us.

            And unfortunately we’re trying to do that while a handful of us try to sever those connections and build physical and metaphorical barriers between us for their own self-interest.

            Most of us struggle with the ability to feel empathy and connection with our own future selves. We often choose instant gratification over personal benefit, we often choose to forego temporary burdens in the present at the foreseen expense of finding greater burdens in the future.

            That’s not greed or self-interest. That’s the opposite of self-interest. That’s just the burden of the rising ape. But it’s no reason to lose hope, and it’s no reason to stop trying.

            The most important proof that humans aren’t all greedy and selfish is that people are still trying to do better. We are still trying to build better connections, even as others try to tear them apart.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          thank you for making this point. capitalist realism is a huge barrier to people imagining a better future.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh, absolutely. Humans will prevail. But right now the forest is on fire and many of us are the small bits on the forest floor that will be completely consumed by the oncoming fire. The destruction will test the perseverance of everything and the burgeoning that follows will be another minor Renaissance, like the period between WW2 and the Internet. When ignorance reigns and sequels are the only entertainment, expect the worst.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      How many died before France got the revolution it needed to eventually make things better?

      How many need to die right now for shit to happen so things finally start improving?

      We might prevail in the end, but how long will we suffer in the meantime?

  • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t want to get along with anyone, but this is the outcome I hope for.

    (Everyone just needs to come to the conclusion that I’m right and we’ll be able to live happily.)

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Depends on what one calls a good future. On a long enough timeline, everything (probably) decays to photons in an infinitely expanding universe. On an even muuuuch longer (est. 10 to the 10th to the 10th to the 1.2nd years) timeline, another iteration of this exact universe’s timeline spontaneously exists all over again.